PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

EEG-Based Seizure Prediction Approaches Within Clinically Relevant Pre-seizure Windows Using Scalp EEG Datasets: A Systematic Review

AAAesha Ali AlasadeAGA. GehaniHOHind Mohammedsalih Osman

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of EEG-based seizure prediction models, specifically focusing on their performance in clinically relevant pre-seizure windows.
  • Conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating deep learning and machine learning models using public scalp EEG datasets.
  • Assessed predictive performance metrics including sensitivity and false alarm rates, as well as methodological consistency among studies.
  • Reviewed validation strategies and design features to identify those linked to clinically actionable performance.
  • Performance variability was substantial, with moderate-to-high sensitivity reported in specific settings.
  • Common limitations included heterogeneous study designs, reliance on internal validation, and inconsistent reporting of false alarms.
  • Confidence in real-world applicability was limited due to unclear risk of bias and lack of standardized prediction windows.

Abstract

This systematic review synthesized evidence on EEG-based seizure prediction within clinically relevant pre-seizure windows, focusing on deep learning and machine learning models evaluated on public datasets. The review aimed to summarize predictive performance, including sensitivity, receiver operating characteristic curve findings when reported, and false-alarm outcomes for scalp EEG seizure prediction systems. It also examined methodological heterogeneity across studies, including the preictal window, defined as the period before seizure onset used for prediction; the seizure prediction horizon, defined as the minimum warning interval before seizure onset; and the seizure occurrence period, defined as the interval during which a seizure is expected after an alarm. Additional objectives were to compare validation strategies, including patient-wise generalization, and to identify design features most consistently associated with clinically actionable performance. The included evidence showed substantial variability in reported performance. It was limited by heterogeneous study designs, frequent reliance on patient-specific internal validation, limited external validation, inconsistent reporting of false alarms, and high or unclear risk of bias. Although scalp EEG seizure prediction models have shown potential to achieve moderate-to-high sensitivity in selected settings, confidence in their real-world generalizability remains limited. Overall, the findings suggest that clinical translation will require more standardized prediction windows, clearer reporting of alarm burdens, stronger validation frameworks, and prospective evaluations under real-world conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alasade et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc3a6dee9eb8c0dce5156https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.109989
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1EEG datasets for seizure detection and prediction— A review2023 · 90 citations
  2. 2Comparison between epileptic seizure prediction and forecasting based on machine learning2024 · 34 citations
  3. 3Feature fusion ensemble classification approach for epileptic seizure prediction using electroencephalographic bio-signals2025 · 5 citations
  4. 4The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 103,986 citations
  5. 5Seizure prediction: the long and winding road2006 · 1,125 citations