PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of American College Health0 citationsOpen Access

Food insecurity in New York City college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of predictors, correlates, and trajectories

View Full Paper
CHCraig J. HeckDTDeborah TheodoreAAApril Autry

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to examine the predictors, correlates, and trajectories of food insecurity among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Self-administered questionnaires were completed by undergraduate students quarterly from 2020 to 2021.
  • Food insecurity was measured based on responses regarding available food and meals.
  • Trajectories of food insecurity were created using cumulative reports over the study period.
  • Food insecurity varied over time with rates of 21% (T1), 25% (T2), 17% (T3), and 19% (T4).
  • Factors predicting food insecurity included preexisting food insecurity, low social support, and experiences of violence.
  • Five percent of students experienced persistent food insecurity, correlated with high psychological distress and unsafe home perceptions.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine predictors, correlates, and trajectories of food insecurity (FI) among students during COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Undergraduates. METHODS: Between 2020-2021, students completed quarterly (T1-T4) self-administered questionnaires. FI comprised food not lasting or not affording balanced meals. Trajectories were created using cumulative FI reports. RESULTS: Across time, FI varied (T1 = 21%, T2 = 25%, T3 = 17%, T4 = 19%). FI predictors included preexisting FI, need-based aid, low social support, alcohol use, COVID-19 care-seeking behaviors, violence experience, transgender/gender non-conforming TGNC identity, and unsafe home perceptions. FI trajectories spanned Never (69%), Rarely (12% FI once), Frequently (14% FI twice/thrice), and Persistently (5%). Along with low social support, Persistently FI students had high psychological distress, need-based aid, unsafe home perceptions, smoking/vaping, drug use, TGNC representation, violence experience, and COVID-19 care-seeking behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: FI was associated with sociodemographic, residential, interpersonal, psychosocial, behavioral, and healthcare-related factors. In routine campus operations and emergency situations, universities must develop multi-component interventions to address multi-factorial stressors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heck et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc3d7dee9eb8c0dce562ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2026.2674845
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1“If the college adjusted the prices…”: comparing food secure and insecure college students during the COVID-19 pandemic2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Combined effects of food and housing insecurity on academic attrition: Findings from a population-representative survey of urban Public University students2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Correlates of verbal and physical violence experienced and perpetrated among cisgender college women: serial cross-sections during one year of the COVID-19 pandemic2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Food Insecurity and Mental Health Trajectories during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey2022 · 9 citations
  5. 5Object-Oriented Computation of Sandwich Estimators2006 · 724 citations