PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Conflict and Health0 citationsOpen Access

Between trauma and resilience - an ecological model of the determinants of mental health among Ukrainian war refugees in Europe: a cross-sectional study

MSMałgorzata SzkupAKArtur KotwasKEKarmen Erjavec

Key Points

  • This study aims to identify multilevel predictors of psychological distress in Ukrainian war refugees using an ecological framework.
  • Cross-sectional study conducted across eight European countries with 1,622 adult refugees participating.
  • Psychological distress assessed using the Refugee Health Screener-15 and cultural trauma symptoms evaluated with the Cultural Symptoms of Trauma Scale.
  • Non-parametric tests and logistic regression were applied to identify predictors of distress.
  • Higher distress correlated with poorer self-rated health (OR 1.40), weaker family relationships, and unemployment (or economic strain).
  • Macrosystem factors such as emotional and cognitive trauma symptoms were strong predictors (OR 1.40-2.78).
  • Refugees who left Ukraine later showed lower risk of distress.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The full-scale invasion of Ukraine has generated the largest refugee crisis in Europe since the Second World War, exposing civilians to trauma, displacement, and prolonged uncertainty. Refugees face stressors across multiple ecological levels, making Bronfenbrenner's model a suitable framework for understanding mental health determinants. This study examined multilevel predictors of psychological distress among Ukrainian war refugees in Europe. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2025 across eight European countries. A total of 1,622 adult refugees completed standardized questionnaires. Psychological distress was assessed with the Refugee Health Screener-15 (RHS-15), and cultural trauma symptoms with the Cultural Symptoms of Trauma Scale (CSTS). Sociodemographic, relational, economic, institutional, cultural, and temporal variables were organised within Bronfenbrenner's ecological model. Group comparisons were conducted using non-parametric tests, and predictors of distress were identified through logistic regression. RESULTS: Higher distress was associated with poorer self-rated health, weaker family and social relationships, unemployment, economic strain, and contact with family in war-affected areas. The strongest predictors were macrosystem factors, including emotional, cognitive, existential, and agency-related trauma symptoms (OR 1.40-2.78). Protective factors included better health, stronger family relationships, employment, and favourable economic conditions. Refugees who left Ukraine later in the conflict showed lower distress risk. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health outcomes among Ukrainian refugees reflect interactions across ecological levels. Interventions should integrate individual, relational, community, economic, and culturally informed components to address the multifaceted nature of refugee distress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Szkup et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc3d7dee9eb8c0dce5677https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-026-00812-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Family Interventions for Trauma-Affected Refugees2022 · 21 citations
  2. 2“Hidden” and Diverse Long-Term Impacts of Exposure to War and Violence2020 · 25 citations
  3. 3Beyond PTSD and Fear-Based Conditioning: Anger-Related Responses Following Experiences of Forced Migration—A Systematic Review2018 · 15 citations
  4. 4An ecological model for refugee mental health: implications for research2016 · 34 citations
  5. 5A systematic review of resilience and mental health outcomes of conflict-driven adult forced migrants2014 · 303 citations