PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society0 citationsOpen Access

Plant preference of Nesidiocoris tenuis for tomato and sesame

RNRyohei NakanoTATetsuya Adachi-Hagimori

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the plant preferences of Nesidiocoris tenuis between tomato and sesame.
  • Conducted dual-choice tests with potted tomato and sesame plants.
  • Used individuals reared on an unrelated plant species for comparison.
  • Assessed effects of temporary feeding experience on preference.
  • No innate preference observed in individuals reared on Crassula ovata.
  • Temporary feeding experience increased preference for the respective experienced plant species.
  • Findings align with previous studies on tomato and cleome plant preferences.

Abstract

Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) is an effective zoophytophagous predator of small insect pests in greenhouse vegetables such as tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and cleome (Cleome hassleriana Chod.) plants fully support the development and reproduction of N. tenuis. Consequently, these non-crop plants are used as secondary plants (e.g., banker plants) for this mirid. However, the preferences of N. tenuis for crop and these non-crop plants remain unclear. In this study, we evaluated the plant preferences of this bug for tomato and sesame in dual-choice tests using potted plants. Individuals naively reared on a plant species Crassula ovata (Mill.) Druce unrelated to tomato or sesame exhibited no clear preference for either, suggesting that the innate preference of N. tenuis for both plant species was equal. In contrast, individuals with temporary (24 h) feeding experience on tomato or sesame showed an increased preference for the experienced plant species. These results indicate that plant preference in N. tenuis among these plant species is modulated by learning, suggesting that its plant preference may be artificially manipulated. These findings are consistent with results from a previous study conducted with tomato and cleome and may contribute to improving release strategies for this predator.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nakano et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc3eddee9eb8c0dce58fdhttps://doi.org/10.4165/kapps.68.89
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Tritrophic Interactions Mediated by Zoophytophagous Predator-Induced Host Plant Volatiles2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Residual toxicity of pesticide active substance commonly used in tomato crop on the predator <i>Nesidiocoris tenuis</i> (Heteroptera: Miridae)2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Development, Survival and Reproduction of Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Sesame Cultivars and Implications for the Management of this Stink Bug2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Herbivory on Banker Plants Enhances Resistance-Related Responses of Neighboring Tomato Plants to the Two-Spotted Spider Mite2026
  5. 5Advancing tomato crop protection: Green leaf volatile-mediated defense mechanisms against Nesidiocoris tenuis plant damage2024 · 3 citations