PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Haemophilia0 citationsOpen Access

Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Haemophilia Activities List in Patients With Inherited Bleeding Disorders

View Full Paper
JBJohan BlokzijlIKIsolde A. R. KuijlaarsMPMartijn F. Pisters

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of the Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) for measuring limitations in activities among individuals with inherited bleeding disorders.
  • PWBD scheduled for orthopaedic surgery completed the HAL and reference PROMs at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months post-surgery.
  • General perceived effect assessments were conducted at 3 and 12 months post-surgery.
  • The HAL sum score showed moderate to strong correlation with changes in physical functioning PROMs (r: 0.56) and ADL PROMs (r: 0.65).
  • The HAL distinguished between participants who improved and those who did not (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71–1.0).
  • MIC improvement was −2.3 (95% CI: −6.0; 1.4) and MIC deterioration was −4.9 (95% CI: −8.4; −2.5).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) is a disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM) that is widely used in both healthcare and research in people with inherited bleeding disorders (PWBD), but information on responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) is lacking. Aim The aim of this study is to determine the responsiveness and MIC of the HAL to measure self‐reported limitations in activities in PWBD. Methods PWBD on the waiting list for orthopaedic surgery were invited to participate. Participants completed the HAL, reference PROMs regarding pain, physical functioning and ADL activities at baseline, 3 months and 12 months after surgery. The general perceived effect was completed at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Results A total of 32 surgeries performed in 28 participants were included. Three months after surgery the change of the HAL sum score showed moderate to strong correlation with the change on the physical functioning PROMs ( r: 0.56) and the change on the ADL PROMs ( r: 0.65) and weak correlation with pain scores. The HAL was well able to discriminate participants that improved in self‐reported limitations in activities and participation from those that did not improve (AUC: 0.86 (95%CI: 0.71–1.0)). The MIC improvement was −2.3 (95%CI: −6.0;1.4) and the MIC deterioriation −4.9 (95%CI: −8.4;−2.5). Conclusion As the MIC is smaller than the smallest detectable change (SDC) of the HAL, it can be assumed that if a person has improved or deteriorated more than the known SDC of 10.2 (previous research), they are likely to experience a meaningful change over time.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blokzijl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc49adee9eb8c0dce61a1https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70327
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes2010 · 4,551 citations
  2. 2A critical review of methods used to determine the smallest worthwhile effect of interventions for low back pain2011 · 127 citations
  3. 3Haemophilia and Joint Disease: Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Management2011 · 180 citations
  4. 4Validation of the Italian Version of the Haemophilia Activities List2016 · 5 citations
  5. 5Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients2006 · 239 citations