PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of Hypertension0 citations

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Treatment Regimens for Resistant Hypertension: A System Review and Network Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
YXYao XiaoKLKai Liu

Key Result

Aldosterone receptor antagonists significantly lowered office systolic blood pressure compared to control (MD -10.3; 95% CI -12.74 to -8) in patients with resistant hypertension.

Key Points

  • To compare the effects of various treatments on resistant hypertension through a network meta-analysis.
  • Systematic search conducted in multiple databases until May 10, 2025.
  • Random effects network meta-analysis comparing change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure between interventions.
  • Included 26 eligible studies in the final analysis.
  • MRA significantly lowered both office SBP by -10.3 (95% CI: -12.74 to -8) and office DBP by -4.36 (95% CI: -5.97 to -2.84) compared to the control group.
  • RDN reduced office DBP by -6.09 (95% CI: -9.04 to -3.08) and 24-h DBP by -3.34 (95% CI: -5.6 to -1.6) compared to control group.
  • Lifestyle modifications also effectively reduced office SBP and 24-h BP, ranking among the top treatments.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis

Structured PICO

Do various pharmacological, device-based, and lifestyle interventions reduce blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension?

P
Population
26 eligible studies evaluating different treatments for resistant hypertension.
I
Intervention
Second-generation renal denervation (RDN), aldosterone receptor antagonist (MRA), endothelin receptor antagonist, aldosterone synthase inhibitor, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, baroreflex activation therapy, central arteriovenous anastomosis, and lifestyle modification
C
Comparator
Control group
O
Outcome
Change in office and 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP)surrogate

In a network meta-analysis, MRAs and lifestyle modifications emerged as top treatments for resistant hypertension, with renal denervation serving as an effective alternative, particularly for uncontrolled diastolic blood pressure.

Main Result

Mean Difference: -10.3 (95% CI -12.74–-8)

Abstract

Objective: Our study tends to perform a network meta-analysis to compare the effect of different treatments on resistant hypertension (RH).Design and method: A systematic search was conducted in databases up to May 10, 2025. We conducted a network meta-analysis using random effects to compare the change of systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) between the following interventions: second-generation renal denervation (RDN), aldosterone receptor antagonist (MRA), endothelin receptor antagonist, aldosterone synthase inhibitor, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, baroreflex activation therapy, central arteriovenous anastomosis, lifestyle, and control group. Results: 26 eligible studies were included in the final analysis. After conducting sensitivity analyses, MRA significantly lowered both office and 24-h blood pressure (BP) compared to control group (mean difference, -10.3, 95% confidence interval, -12.74 to -8 for office SBP; -4.36, -5.97 to -2.84 for office DBP; -9.73, -12.18 to -7.19 for 24-h SBP; -3.22, -5 to -1.44 for 24-h DBP). RDN effectively reduced both office and 24-h BP, and it caused a large reduction in DBP compared to control group (-6.09, -9.04 to -3.08 for office DBP; -3.34, -5.6 to -1.6 for 24-h DBP). Lifestyle modification effectively reduced office SBP and 24-h BP, and it as well as MRA were almost all in the top three treatments. Conclusions: MRA can be the priority treatment for RH. RDN is also a good alternative to MRA in the treatment of RH, especially in individuals characterized by uncontrolled DBP. A combination of lifestyle interventions alongside pharmacological/device-based therapies may represent the optimal approach. More trials concerning other treatments for RH are needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiao et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in resistant hypertension. Aldosterone receptor antagonist (MRA) vs. Control group was evaluated on change of office systolic blood pressure (MD -10.3, 95% CI -12.74 to -8). Aldosterone receptor antagonists significantly lowered office systolic blood pressure compared to control (MD -10.3; 95% CI -12.74 to -8) in patients with resistant hypertension.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc49adee9eb8c0dce628bhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001196788.17310.e0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper