PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Climate Services0 citationsOpen Access

Regional disparities in flood vulnerability and adaptive capacity: a national-scale assessment for South Korea

View Full Paper
SYSieun YangBKBrian H. S. Kim

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate flood vulnerability through a comprehensive framework that highlights regional disparities across South Korea.
  • Developed an indicator-based framework assessing vulnerability in 228 administrative districts
  • Constructed a Flood Vulnerability Index using the entropy-weighting method
  • Conducted spatial autocorrelation analysis with Global Moran’s I
  • Identified two distinct vulnerability patterns: urban vulnerability paradox and rural decline
  • Urban areas show high adaptive capacity but high asset exposure, increasing vulnerability
  • Rural areas face high social sensitivity and low financial capacity, affecting their flood management capabilities

Abstract

Increasing flood frequency and intensity due to climate change pose a significant global threat, necessitating robust regional vulnerability assessments. However, national-scale vulnerability assessments often overlook local-level socioeconomic drivers and institutional financial capacity. This study addresses this gap by developing and applying a comprehensive, indicator-based framework to assess flood vulnerability across all 228 administrative districts of South Korea. Using the entropy-weighting method, we constructed a Flood Vulnerability Index (FVI) encompassing exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Notably, this study innovates by integrating local government expenditure data as a direct proxy for financial adaptive capacity. To examine the robustness of the indicator-based regional vulnerability assessment, we also conducted spatial autocorrelation analysis using Global Moran’s I. Results reveal significant regional disparities, uncovering two distinct vulnerability patterns. First, an urban vulnerability paradox exists where the high adaptive capacity of major metropolitan areas is dangerously offset by immense population and asset exposure. Second, a pattern of rural decline is identified, where low physical exposure is critically undermined by high social sensitivity (e.g., aging populations, fragile infrastructure) and chronically low financial capacity to manage flood events. Spatial autocorrelation analysis confirmed that high-vulnerability regions statistically cluster in major metropolitan areas. This framework provides an evidence-based tool for policymakers to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach. It enables the strategic allocation of national resources for flood mitigation and climate adaptation in both urban and rural contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc49adee9eb8c0dce62c6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2026.100677
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A comprehensive approach for assessing social flood vulnerability and social flood risk: The case of Denmark2024 · 30 citations
  2. 2An integrated approach to characterizing infrastructure socio-physical impact of hazards to guide mitigation efforts in a community2026 · 14 citations
  3. 3Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach – a case study for Santiago de Chile2011 · 196 citations
  4. 4Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models2016 · 763 citations
  5. 5Vulnerability assessments and their planning implications: a case study of the Hutt Valley, New Zealand2012 · 103 citations