PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Neurotrauma Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Analyzing the Spectrum of mTBI Subgroups

View Full Paper
JBJoshua A. BeitchmanNDNyaz DidehbaniSMShane M. Miller

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze clinical trajectories of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) subtypes and identify improvements for individualized care.
  • Reviewed literature on mTBI subtypes, focusing on symptom clusters identified at different recovery timepoints.
  • Described five symptom-based subtypes: cognitive, somatosensory, vestibular-ocular, headache, and neuropsychiatric.
  • Analyzed issues with terminology and overlapping characteristics among subtypes.
  • Identified significant overlap and ambiguity between the described mTBI subtypes.
  • Noted that inconsistent terminology limits comparisons across studies.
  • Emphasized that incorporating objective data may enhance understanding of mTBI recovery and management.

Abstract

Patients who sustain a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) experience a variety of clinical trajectories. Recent efforts to identify mTBI subtypes have begun to describe observed phenotypic variability. Clinical applicability of these subtypes is limited due to critical variations in each subtype’s defining characteristics and limited inclusion of objective data. Here, we review mTBI literature that describes subtypes at various timepoints following injury. We describe five predominately symptom-based subtypes (cognitive, somatosensory, vestibular-ocular, headache, and neuropsychiatric affective/behavioral). Each of these subgroups has been reported at separate timepoints postinjury, with the majority of studies describing symptom clusters in the acute and subacute recovery period. Analysis of each subgroup indicates significant overlap and ambiguity within the currently described symptom-based subtypes of mTBI. Additionally, inconsistent terminology within symptom description and subtyping nomenclature limit the ability to compare among one another. We suggest that improved understanding of possible biological processes that contribute to certain clinical trajectories may be identified by incorporating objective assessments, biomarkers, neuroimaging, and genetic analysis into future mTBI subtyping analysis. In doing so, advancements toward individualized symptom management, recovery, and improved care for our mTBI community are possible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beitchman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc509dee9eb8c0dce6711https://doi.org/10.1177/2689288x261450403
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Autonomic dysfunction in adults following mild traumatic brain injury: A systematic review2022 · 42 citations
  2. 2A comprehensive, targeted approach to the clinical care of athletes following sport‐related concussion2013 · 328 citations
  3. 3Sex-specific interneuron vulnerability after traumatic brain injury correlates with neurotrophic signaling and chloride homeostasis, independent of behavioral and network outcomes2025 · 3 citations
  4. 4Fatigue After Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Impact on Participation and Quality of Life2008 · 276 citations
  5. 5Dimensions of postconcussive symptoms in children with mild traumatic brain injuries2009 · 251 citations