PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research0 citations

Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Project-Based Learning Methods Incorporated into Food Service Courses for Dietetic Students

View Full Paper
MKMelissa A. KelleyAPAlissa Perteet-JacksonMRMarla Reicks

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the strengths and areas for improvement in food service courses using project-based learning.
  • Implemented redesigned courses in fall 2022 and spring 2023 semesters.
  • Used modified nominal group technique sessions with 41 nutrition students to rank themes.
  • Each session had 6–8 student participants discussing experiences and suggestions.
  • Top strengths included hands-on learning (SS = 122), autonomy and creativity (SS = 87), and practical project work (SS = 56).
  • Recommendations emphasized the need for more formal lectures (SS = 110) and additional instructor support (SS = 74).
  • Students expressed a desire for more in-class project time and meetings with professional advisors (SS = 68).

Abstract

Purpose: Food service management courses are traditionally taught in a didactic manner. However, student-centred methods based on collaboration and applying content in real-world situations may enhance learning. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate strengths and recommendations for improvement of undergraduate food service courses following redesign using project-based learning (PBL) components. Methods: Redesigned courses were implemented in fall (2022) and spring (2023) semesters in a flipped classroom with year-long projects self-selected by student teams. Evaluation was based on 7 modified nominal group technique sessions conducted after the spring semester with 41 nutrition students (6–8 per session) to identify and rank themes based on summed scores (SS). Results: Top strengths were (i) experiencing PBL components that contributed to hands-on learning, autonomy, creativity, and flexibility, (ii) learning about engaging self-identified topics, (iii) practicing workplace skills, and (iv) working on practical, real-life projects (SS = 122, 87, 78, and 56, respectively). Top recommendations included more formal lectures to provide course content, more instructor support/guidance, and more in-class time for projects and meetings with professional advisors (SS = 110, 74, and 68, respectively). Conclusions: PBL was a positive experience; however, students desired more lecture-based course content and class time for projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kelley et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc509dee9eb8c0dce6855https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2026-008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing Student Engagement Using the Flipped Classroom2014 · 1,070 citations
  2. 2Using Experiential Learning to Enhance Student Outcomes in a Didactic Program in Dietetics Foodservice Management Course2021 · 6 citations
  3. 3Students’ Perspective on Active Learning in Nutrition Education2019 · 12 citations
  4. 4Development of professional practice through problem-based learning in human nutrition and Dietetics2016 · 3 citations
  5. 5Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots2006 · 836 citations