PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Energy Research & Social Science0 citationsOpen Access

The global refining disorder: The political geography of crude processing

View Full Paper
AEAlexander EtkindGKGeorg-Henri KaupAAAyansina Ayanlade

Key Points

  • This article aims to examine why refineries are distributed across the globe and the forces shaping their locations.
  • Developed the Global Refining Disorder concept to analyze refinery siting.
  • Conducted comparative analysis of five countries: United States, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Nigeria.
  • Calculated derived measures including refining lag and export-to-refining ratio to operationalize carbon flows.
  • Identified two ideal types of refining political economy: mercantile pump and developmental syringe.
  • Demonstrated that refineries are vulnerable components of the global energy system, exemplified by events in Ukraine and Iran.
  • Argued that political choices, not geological or market signals, are key in the transition to circular energy supply.

Abstract

Why are refineries where they are, and what forces explain their distribution across planetary space? This article develops the concept of the Global Refining Disorder (GRD) to analyze the political geography of crude oil processing. Departing from location theory, which privileges transport-cost minimization, we argue that refinery siting is determined by the interplay of national strategies, security regimes, postcolonial legacies, and economies of scale. We identify two ideal types of refining political economy — the mercantile pump , which concentrates processing capacity near centers of power and imports crude from peripheries, and the developmental syringe , which locates refining near extraction sites to stimulate peripheral growth. Working across five comparative cases – the United States, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and Nigeria – we analyze the transportation triangles shaped by oil fields, refineries, and consumers of fuel. To operationalize these carbon flows, we calculate two derived measures — refining lag and the export-to-refining ratio . With the concept of securitization of scalability , we explain how economies of scale generate systemic vulnerability of refineries. Recent events in Ukraine and Iran empirically demonstrate that refineries constitute the most vulnerable component of the global energy system. Looking forward, we argue that the path from refining to circularity secures decentralization of energy supply, with political choice — rather than geological endowment or market signals — remaining the decisive variable in transition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Etkind et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc509dee9eb8c0dce685ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104776
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Does Oil Refining Capacity Influence Environmental Quality in Nigeria?2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Stepping into the just transition journey: The energy transition in petrostates2024 · 27 citations
  3. 3An assessment of the economic viability and competitiveness of modular refinery in Nigeria2018 · 13 citations
  4. 4Understanding carbon lock-in2000 · 3,219 citations
  5. 5Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N. J.) Case1958 · 401 citations