PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World0 citationsOpen Access

Resource Stratification and Income Segregation in Brazilian and Chilean Universities

View Full Paper
DKDanilo Kuzmanic

Key Points

  • The study examines the relationship between resource inequality and student income segregation in Brazilian and Chilean universities.
  • Analyzed administrative data from 2017 to 2019 across universities in Brazil and Chile.
  • Compared resource levels and income segregation between public and private institutions.
  • Assessed the impact of research intensity on resource distribution.
  • High-income students in Chile attend universities with 1.7 times more resources than lower-income peers, compared to 1.3 times in Brazil.
  • Larger resource disparities exist in the public sector for both countries, linked to differences in research capacities.
  • Private universities targeting high-income students access more resources regardless of research intensity.

Abstract

Wealthy universities enjoy advantages in accessing resources, disproportionately benefiting high-income students who are overrepresented in these institutions. Using administrative data from 2017 to 2019, the author analyzes the relationship between resource inequality and student income segregation across universities in Brazil and Chile. Both countries have significantly expanded higher education through the entry of new private institutions while introducing large-scale equity policies. The findings show comparable levels of resource inequality in both countries but greater student segregation in Chile. As a result, high-income students in Chile attend universities with 1.7 times more resources than their lower income peers compared with 1.3 times in Brazil. The public sector exhibits larger resource disparities in both countries, which is closely connected to differences in research intensity. High-income students are concentrated at well-funded public institutions that conduct most of these countries’ research, while public universities serving lower income students are more likely to be underfunded. In contrast, research disparities play a more minor role in the private sector: private universities targeting high-income niches access more resources regardless of their research capacity. The concentration of resources in a few institutions that primarily enroll high-income students is likely to lessen the equity implications of increasing participation in higher education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Danilo Kuzmanic (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc530dee9eb8c0dce6933https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231261451346
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper