PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026IET Intelligent Transport Systems0 citationsOpen Access

Adaptive Path Tracking Control Method for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning

View Full Paper
YXYuxin XuXTXinhua TangZCZ H Chen

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a robust adaptive path tracking method for autonomous vehicles using deep reinforcement learning to enhance tracking stability and generalization.
  • Implemented a twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm for path tracking.
  • Introduced a dynamic look-ahead mechanism to adjust steering angles based on curvature preview.
  • Designed a piecewise reward function incorporating vehicle internal states and trajectory positioning.
  • Achieved a lateral tracking error below 0.1 m at 10 m/s, a 50% improvement over traditional methods.
  • Maintained velocity control error within 1 m/s, ensuring effective coordination between lateral and longitudinal movements.
  • Exhibited lateral error within 0.15 m across varying target speeds, demonstrating strong generalization.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Path tracking is crucial for autonomous vehicle stability, but traditional methods struggle under high‐speed and uncertain conditions, while deep learning approaches often lack generalization. To address these issues, this paper proposes an adaptive path trac‐king control method based on the twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm. The method introduces a dynamic look‐ahead mechanism that adjusts the steering angle based on previewed curvature, effectively mitigating delayed responses in high‐curvature turns. Additionally, a piecewise reward function with safety‐based terminal penalties is designed based on the vehicle's internal states and relative pose with respect to the reference trajectory, enabling coordinated control of lateral dynamics, longitudinal motion and ride comfort. Experimental results show that at a target speed of 10 m/s, the method achieves a lateral tracking error below 0.1 m across multiple trajectories, representing an improvement of nearly 50% compared to a traditional model predictive control method. The velocity control error remains within 1 m/s, demonstrating coordination between lateral and longitudinal control and ensuring high tracking accuracy. Furthermore, even across a range of target speeds, the method maintains a lateral error within 0.15 m, exhibiting strong generalization and providing a solid foundation for real‐world deployment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc550dee9eb8c0dce6bedhttps://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.70223
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Autonomous port traffic safety orientated vehicle kinematic information exploitation via port-like videos2025 · 17 citations
  2. 2Microscopic aggregated traffic parameter extraction against complex camera motion interference2025 · 11 citations
  3. 3Trajectory Tracking and Speed Control of Cleaning Vehicle Based on Improved Pure Pursuit Algorithm2019 · 23 citations
  4. 4Adaptive Look-Ahead Distance Based on an Intelligent Fuzzy Decision for an Autonomous Vehicle2023 · 14 citations
  5. 5Integrated Longitudinal and Lateral Control for Kuafu-II Autonomous Vehicle2015 · 68 citations