PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism0 citations

Acute GIP and GLP ‐1 Administration Exerts Differential Metabolic Effects in Totally Pancreatectomised Individuals

View Full Paper
LKLiva S. L. KroghMHMaja B. HansenNBNatasha C. Bergmann

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the extrapancreatic effects of GIP and GLP-1 on postprandial physiology in individuals who have undergone total pancreatectomy.
  • Randomised double-blind design involving 12 totally pancreatectomised individuals
  • Participants underwent four liquid mixed meal tests during 270-min intravenous infusions of GIP, GLP-1, GIP+GLP-1, and saline
  • Measurements included blood samples, appetite-related measures, hemodynamic measures, and food intake data
  • GLP-1 infusion reduced postprandial glucose excursions by 45% (p=0.005) and gastric emptying rate by 29% (p=0.05)
  • GIP+GLP-1 co-infusion led to a 31% decrease in ad libitum food intake compared to placebo (p=0.018)
  • GIP infusion increased heart rate by 10 bpm (p=0.004), decreased diastolic blood pressure by 9.1 bpm (p=0.002), and inhibited postprandial bone resorption by 65% (p=0.003)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims While being recognised for stimulating pancreatic insulin secretion, GIP and GLP‐1 exert various extrapancreatic effects relevant in the context of incretin‐based therapies. Here, we evaluated the extrapancreatic effects of GIP and GLP‐1, separately and combined, on postprandial physiology in totally pancreatectomised individuals. Materials and Methods In a randomised double‐blind design, 12 totally pancreatectomised individuals (five women, age: mean ± SD 58.8 ± 13.9 years; BMI: 24.7 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 ) each underwent four liquid mixed meal tests (480 kcal) during 270‐min intravenous infusions of GIP (4 pmol/kg/min), GLP‐1 (1 pmol/kg/min), GIP+GLP‐1 and saline (placebo), respectively. Blood samples, appetite‐related measures, hemodynamic measures, and ad libitum food intake data were collected. Participants continued basal insulin but omitted other medications including bolus insulin from 10 p.m. the night before. Results Compared to placebo, GLP‐1 infusion reduced postprandial glucose excursions by 45% ± 48% ( p = 0.005) and gastric emptying rate by 29% ± 36%, assessed by acetaminophen absorption ( p = 0.05), whereas the effects of GIP were similar to placebo. During GIP+GLP‐1 co‐infusion, ad libitum food intake was 31% ± 22% lower compared to placebo ( p = 0.018) but similar to GLP‐1 infusion. Compared to placebo, infusion of GIP increased heart rate by 10 ± 5.9 bpm ( p = 0.004), decreased diastolic blood pressure by 9.1 ± 5.4 bpm ( p = 0.002), and inhibited postprandial bone resorption assessed by carboxy‐terminal collagen crosslinks by 65% ± 35% ( p = 0.003), whereas GLP‐1 infusion did not affect bone resorption markers. Conclusion Physiological actions of GIP and GLP‐1 were preserved in totally pancreatectomised individuals, demonstrating independency of endogenous pancreatic factors. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT06895408

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krogh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc550dee9eb8c0dce6c10https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70940
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper