PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of Avian Biology0 citationsOpen Access

Passive‐acoustic evidence of lunar, temporal, and weather effects on the vocal activity of four coexisting forest owl species in southern Taiwan

View Full Paper
SWShih‐Hung WuJKJerome Chie‐Jen KoWTWen‐Ling Tsai

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how lunar and weather conditions affect the vocal behaviors of four owl species in southern Taiwan.
  • Utilized a full-year passive acoustic monitoring dataset from Yushan National Park, analyzing 1946 hours of nighttime audio.
  • Employed an AI-based sound recognition model (SILIC ver. exp32) to identify over 700,000 vocalizations.
  • Applied generalized additive models to assess species-specific responses to lunar and weather variables.
  • The collared owlet and northern boobook exhibited increased vocal activity near full moon or high lunar altitude, while other species showed minimal response.
  • Weather factors like wind and rain suppressed vocal activity across all species, with varying impacts.
  • Ecological divergence in nocturnal communication strategies was observed among the owl species, aiding community monitoring efforts.

Abstract

Lunar illumination and environmental conditions are known to shape vocal behavior of nocturnal birds, but few studies have simultaneously compared responses across multiple owl species. Using a full‐year passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) dataset from Yushan National Park, Taiwan, we investigated how four sympatric Strigidae species – mountain scops‐owl Otus spilocephalus , collared owlet Taenioptynx brodiei , collared scops‐owl O. lettia , and northern boobook Ninox japonica – responded to variation in lunar phase, lunar altitude, temporal factors, and weather. We analyzed 1946 h of nighttime audio using an AI‐based sound recognition model (SILIC ver. exp32), yielding over 700 000 vocalizations. Generalized additive models revealed species‐specific responses to lunar variables: while collared owlet and northern boobook increased vocal activity near full moon or high lunar altitude, the other two species remained relatively unaffected. By incorporating both absolute hour and solar‐referenced night‐phase indices, we further clarified how diel behavior varies across seasons. Weather factors such as wind and rain suppressed vocal activity across all species, but to a varying degree. These results highlight the ecological divergence in nocturnal communication strategies among different owl species, with implications for improving survey timing and species detection in community monitoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc56bdee9eb8c0dce6d60https://doi.org/10.1002/jav.03624
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper