PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026IET conference proceedings.0 citations

Comparative clustering strategies for network slicing

View Full Paper
HJHung-Chin JangWLWei-Ya Liao

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate various clustering strategies for effective network slicing in 5G environments.
  • Compared eight clustering strategies using real 5G data across architecture, data type, and algorithm.
  • Analyzed performance metrics of single-layer vs. two-layer clustering models.
  • Utilized K-means and HDBSCAN for two-layer model implementation.
  • Single-layer clustering achieved the highest performance metrics.
  • Two-layer clustering models improved resource distribution and fairness.
  • Combining wireless and service-side features enhanced overall balance.

Abstract

As 5G evolves, effective network slice design is crucial for efficient resource allocation and optimal service quality. This study compares eight clustering strategies across architecture, data type, and algorithm using real 5G data. Results show single-layer clustering achieves top metrics, but two-layer clustering improves distribution and fairness. Combining wireless and service-side features enhances balance, while a two-layer model using K-means and HDBSCAN offers optimal stability and interpretability. These insights provide practical guidance for building more robust and equitable network slicing strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc56bdee9eb8c0dce6dabhttps://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2026.1978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper