PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026World Development Sustainability2 citationsOpen Access

The Persistence of Illegal Artisanal Gold Mining in Ghana: A Governance Analysis of Local Leadership, Corruption, and Enforcement

View Full Paper
BABosompem Ahunoabobirim AgyaPAPortia AgyemangKAKwame Anokye

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to understand how local governance and corruption sustain illegal artisanal gold mining in Ghana.
  • Rapid evidence synthesis of governance failures in local leadership and enforcement.
  • Spatial analysis of mining hotspots like Amansie West and Upper Denkyira.
  • Development of a governance model linking diagnostics with solutions.
  • Identified interactions between local leaders, officials, and miners that uphold illegal mining.
  • Proposed strategies include targeted anti-corruption measures and governance-enabled livelihood diversification.
  • Highlighted costs associated with inaction on illegal mining and environmental degradation.

Abstract

The persistence of illegal artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) in Ghana is a manifestation of systemic governance failure. This study advances a novel analytical framework that integrates actor-network and political economy perspectives to diagnose how formal and informal networks among local leaders, state officials, and miners sustain this illicit economy. Through a rapid evidence synthesis, we demonstrate that the triad of complicit local leadership, systemic corruption, and institutionalized enforcement deficits operates as a mutually reinforcing system. Spatially grounded analysis of hotspots such as Amansie West and Upper Denkyira reveals the precise mechanisms underlying this breakdown in governance. In response, we propose targeted anti-corruption safeguards, advanced monitoring technologies, and governance-enabled livelihood diversification. Aside from aligning ASGM reform with the water-energy-food nexus and SDG 15.3 on land degradation neutrality, we highlight the cross-sectoral costs of inaction. Our contribution lies in synthesizing evidence into a transferable governance model that links institutional diagnostics with actionable strategies for mineral-dependent states.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agya et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc58bdee9eb8c0dce6f56https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2026.100322
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper