PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of Prosthodontics0 citations

Computer‐aided design of anterior guidance with a modified patient‐specific motion technique in anterior implant‐supported single crowns: A multicenter crossover trial

View Full Paper
LSLiang ShaoBLBin LuoRZRui Zhang

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of CAD anterior guidance using a modified patient-specific motion technique compared to traditional methods.
  • Randomized crossover design involving 63 patients at three hospitals
  • Two crowns per participant designed with modified PSM and a digital articulator
  • Statistical analysis using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test
  • Test group had significantly lower maximum occlusal adjustment distance (263.4 µm vs. 362.2 µm, p = 0.001)
  • Reduced adjustment time and area with improved satisfaction levels for patients and dentists (p < 0.050)
  • 42 test group crowns selected vs. 21 control crowns (p = 0.008)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of computer-aided design (CAD) anterior guidance using a modified patient-specific motion (PSM) technique with the digital articulator in implant-supported crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients with a missing maxillary incisor scheduled for implant-supported crowns were enrolled from three hospitals. Modified PSM facilitating dynamic occlusion recording was utilized during intraoral scanning by attaching landmarks to the buccal surface of canines or first premolars. For each participant, two crowns were fabricated, differing only in the anterior guidance design. Test and control groups utilized modified PSM and a digital articulator to design anterior guidance, respectively. Crowns were delivered in a randomized sequence, while intraoral scanning and occlusal evaluation were performed. Occlusal adjustment indicators were calculated. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were primarily used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the test group showed significantly lower maximum occlusal adjustment distance (263.4 269.6 µm vs. 362.2 252.0 µm, p = 0.001) but similar mean and root mean square (p > 0.050). The test group demonstrated significantly reduced adjustment time, adjustment area, and lateroprotrusive interferences and higher patient (before/after adjustment) and dentist (before adjustment) satisfaction than the control group (p 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a digital articulator, CAD anterior guidance using modified PSM for implant-supported single crowns reduces maximum adjustment distance, adjustment time and area, and occlusal interferences, and improves patient/dentist satisfaction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc5b7dee9eb8c0dce718dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70164
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper