PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Wildlife Research1 citations

Estimating the effect of toxic red meat baits on feral cat density in north-eastern New South Wales

View Full Paper
EGElly GoochADAnnalie DorphJHJaime Heiniger

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of toxic red meat baits in reducing feral cat density for wildlife conservation.
  • A grid of 65 camera traps was used to survey feral cat population before and after a 4-week unmonitored baiting period.
  • Individual feral cats were identified using camera traps, and a spatial-mark-resight model was applied to estimate density changes.
  • Feral cat density was measured at 0.56 cats km−2 before baiting and 0.58 cats km−2 after baiting, with 95% CIs indicating minimal change.
  • 34 individual feral cats were identified, with mostly different individuals detected after baiting.
  • Results suggest higher-than-expected local feral cat densities may negatively impact regional biodiversity.

Abstract

Context The management of feral cats (Felis catus) is crucial to effective species conservation. One management approach is to aerially apply toxic baits (containing sodium monofluoroacetate) to achieve landscape scale control. However, limited bait types are available to target cats. Aims In the absence of specific baits (i.e. Eradicat® or Curiosity®) for the control of feral cats in New South Wales (NSW), we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of red meat baits, intended for canid control, to reduce local feral cat density. Methods We deployed a grid of 65 camera traps, spaced at approximately 1-km intervals, in the Guy Fawkes River National Park, NSW. The feral cat population was surveyed 7 weeks prior to and post-baiting, separated by a 4-week baiting period that was unmonitored. Cats detected by camera were individually identified and a spatial-mark-resight model was used to estimate the change in feral cat density. Key results In total, 34 individual feral cats were identified. The feral cats present after baiting were mostly different to those individuals detected prior to baiting. However, feral cat density was not substantially different between surveys (pre-baiting: 0.56 cats km−2, 95% CI: 0.39–0.81 cats km−2; post-baiting: 0.58 cats km−2, 95% CI: 0.40–0.84 cats km−2). Conclusions Aerially deployed red meat baits, intended for canid control, had a negligible effect on feral cat density. The density estimate reported was two times higher than the average cat density previously modelled for natural environments across Australia. Implications With a higher-than-expected density, and no clear population reduction from red meat baiting, it is possible the local feral cat population may be having a greater impact on regional biodiversity than previously expected. However, given the lack of replication, we caution against pre-emptively generalising the outcomes of this study across different seasons and ecoregions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gooch et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc5b7dee9eb8c0dce71b3https://doi.org/10.1071/wr25064
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Feral cat control: improving Eradicat® bait efficiency and effectiveness for fauna conservation in the Southern Jarrah Forest, Western Australia2024
  2. 2Current and emerging feral cat management practices in Australia2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Effectiveness of toxic baiting for the control of canines and felines2024
  4. 4Evaluating red fox (Vulpes vulpes) presence in a baited landscape: a snapshot from the Northern Jarrah Forest2026
  5. 5Here kitty-kitty: lure choice for predator attraction in a temperate environment2024 · 2 citations