PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Clinical Value of a Novel Apparent Diffusion Coefficient-Based Bi-Color Map for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study

View Full Paper
MOMitsuo OkadaYAYoichi ArakiYHYosuke Hirasawa

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an ADC-based bi-color map in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.
  • Retrospective analysis of 108 targeted biopsies and 93 radical prostatectomies.
  • Examined association between ADC-based bi-color map positivity and clinically significant prostate cancer.
  • Evaluated additional color map-positive lesions not classified as PI-RADS ≥ 3 in the prostatectomy cohort.
  • In the biopsy cohort, csPC was detected in 65 out of 157 lesions (41.4%) with PI-RADS ≥ 3.
  • Among these, 70 lesions (44.6%) were positive on the bi-color map, identifying csPC in 49 lesions (70.0%).
  • In the prostatectomy cohort, csPC was confirmed in 126 out of 215 color map-positive lesions (58.6%), including 55 out of 82 lesions not classified as PI-RADS ≥ 3 (67.1%).

Abstract

Background: Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values are independent predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). We developed a novel ADC-based bi-color map and evaluated its utility for identifying lesions suspicious for csPC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 108 targeted prostate biopsy cases and 93 radical prostatectomy cases. In the biopsy cohort, we assessed the association between ADC-based bi-color map positivity and csPC in lesions with a Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥ 3. In the prostatectomy cohort, we evaluated additional color map-positive lesions not categorized as PI-RADS ≥ 3 on preoperative MRI. Results: In the biopsy cohort, 118 lesions were positive on the ADC-based bi-color map, including lesions outside PI-RADS ≥ 3 categories. Among 157 lesions with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3, csPC was detected in 65 lesions (41.4%). Of these lesions, 70 (44.6%) were positive on the bi-color map, and csPC was identified in 49 (70.0%). The added value of the bi-color map was most evident in PI-RADS 4 lesions, where csPC detection rates were significantly higher in color map-positive than in color map-negative lesions (74.4% vs. 23.3%). In the prostatectomy cohort, 215 lesions were positive on the bi-color map, and csPC was confirmed pathologically in 126 lesions (58.6%). Among 82 color map-positive lesions not classified as PI-RADS ≥3, 55 (67.1%) corresponded to csPC. Conclusions: The ADC-based bi-color map may improve lesion highlighting and risk stratification for csPC and help identify suspicious lesions overlooked on conventional MRI assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Okada et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc616dee9eb8c0dce75cchttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18111796
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Deep learning for synthetic PET imaging: a systematic mapping review of techniques, metrics, and clinical relevance2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Informed Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy Naïve Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2019 · 73 citations
  3. 3Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer2019 · 88 citations
  4. 4Relationship between Gleason score and apparent diffusion coefficients of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients2016 · 32 citations
  5. 5Color display in ultrasonography1983 · 44 citations