PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Romanian Journal of Cardiology0 citationsOpen Access

Extended anticoagulation in provoked VTE with persistent risk factors: A meta-analysis of randomised trials

MMMohsin Raj MantooDMDr Saadat Raj MantooMMMir Wajid Majeed

Key Result

Extended DOAC therapy reduced the incidence of recurrent VTE compared with placebo or aspirin (RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07-0.98) without a clear excess risk of major bleeding.

Key Points

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of extended anticoagulation compared to no treatment in patients with provoked VTE and persistent risk factors.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Eligibility included adults with provoked VTE, persistent non-malignant risk factors, and prior anticoagulation.
  • Primary outcomes analyzed were recurrent VTE and major bleeding, utilizing random-effects models for risk ratios.
  • Continued DOAC therapy reduced recurrent VTE incidence compared to placebo or aspirin (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07–0.98).
  • Reduced-dose DOAC regimens maintained effectiveness (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11–0.41).
  • Major bleeding events were rare with no significant risk increase from prolonged therapy (RR 2.38, 95% CI 0.87–6.53).

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=2,498)

Structured PICO

Does extended DOAC therapy reduce recurrent VTE in adults with provoked VTE and persistent non-malignant risk factors?

P
Population
2,498 adults with provoked VTE and persistent non-malignant risk factors who had completed initial anticoagulation, analyzed across 3 trials.
I
Intervention
Extended direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy (continued or reduced-dose)
C
Comparator
Placebo, aspirin, or discontinuation of anticoagulation
O
Outcome
Recurrent VTE and major bleedinghard clinical

Extended DOAC therapy significantly reduces the risk of recurrent VTE in patients with provoked VTE and persistent non-malignant risk factors, without a significant increase in major bleeding.

Main Result

Relative Risk: 0.25 (95% CI 0.07–0.98)

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) triggered by transient factors are typically treated with anticoagulants for 3–6 months. However, those with coexisting long-term non-malignant conditions may continue to carry a meaningful risk of recurrence beyond the initial treatment period. The benefit of extended anticoagulation in this subgroup remains uncertain. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of continued and reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy compared with no extended anticoagulation or aspirin in patients with provoked VTE and persistent non-malignant risk factors. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were searched from inception through 15 October 2025. Eligible trials enrolled adults with provoked VTE and persistent non-malignant risk factors who had completed initial anticoagulation and compared extended DOAC therapy with placebo, aspirin or discontinuation. Primary outcomes were recurrent VTE and major bleeding. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using random-effects models, with fixed-effects analyses as sensitivity. Results Three trials, including 2498 participants, were analysed. Continued DOAC therapy was associated with a lower incidence of recurrent VTE compared with placebo or aspirin (RR 0.25, 95% confidence interval CI 0.07–0.98; I 2 34%). Reduced-dose regimens demonstrated comparable effectiveness (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11–0.41). Major bleeding events were infrequent across all groups, and no clear excess risk was observed with extended therapy (RR 2.38, 95% CI 0.87–6.53; I 2 0%). Conclusion Among patients with provoked VTE and ongoing non-malignant risk factors, extended DOAC therapy appears to reduce recurrence without a definite increase in major bleeding. These findings support a more individualised approach to treatment duration in this intermediate-risk population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mantoo et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Provoked VTE with persistent non-malignant risk factors (n=2,498). Extended DOAC therapy vs. Placebo, aspirin, or discontinuation was evaluated on Recurrent VTE (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.98). Extended DOAC therapy reduced the incidence of recurrent VTE compared with placebo or aspirin (RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07-0.98) without a clear excess risk of major bleeding.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc696dee9eb8c0dce78e2https://doi.org/10.2478/rjc-2026-0014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper