PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Intestinal Research0 citationsOpen Access

Rapid diagnosis and therapeutic mitigation in inflammatory bowel disease: utilizing the window of opportunity–findings from the UAE Epi-IBD study

TSThaer Khaleel SwaidLHLayth Raafat HamzehLBLaurette L. Bukasa

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the time to diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease and its effects on surgical and treatment intervention burdens.
  • Retrospective analysis of the UAE Epi-IBD registry.
  • Calculated time to diagnosis from symptom onset to diagnosis.
  • Utilized logistic, Poisson regression, and Cox proportional hazards models for analysis.
  • Median time to diagnosis: 4.0 months for Crohn's disease and 3.0 months for ulcerative colitis.
  • Significant reduction in ulcerative colitis diagnostics post-2021 compared to earlier periods (2.0 months vs. 5.5 months; P=0.006).
  • No association found between diagnostic delay and advanced therapy exposure or surgical risk.

Abstract

Background/Aims: To determine time to diagnosis (TTD) and its impact on surgery and advanced therapy (AT) burden in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a multi-ethnic United Arab Emirates (UAE) cohort, a region in the acceleration phase of IBD incidence. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the UAE Epi-IBD registry. TTD was calculated from patient-reported symptom onset to diagnosis. Logistic, Poisson regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used. Sensitivity analyses using 6- and 18-month thresholds and TTD quartiles were performed. Results: Among 243 patients (148 Crohn's disease CD, 95 ulcerative colitis UC), median TTD was 4.0 months (interquartile range IQR, 1.5-9.0 months) for CD and 3.0 months (IQR, 1.0-7.0 months) for UC (P= 0.111, Wilcoxon; log-rank P= 0.054), shorter than pooled estimates from high-income countries. UC TTD accelerated significantly post-2021 (2.0 months vs. 5.5 months; P= 0.006), while CD remained stable (P= 0.646). Diagnostic speed was identical between tertiary and non-tertiary settings (P= 0.943). Diagnostic delay did not predict AT exposure (P= 0.986) or surgical risk (P= 0.586); instead, penetrating CD phenotype drove therapy burden (P= 0.019). Time to first AT was rapid (median 4.5 months for CD, 14.0 months for UC). Era-stratified analysis showed a trend toward higher AT use in 2021 to 2025 (incidence rate ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.98-1.89; P= 0.071), consistent with expanding therapeutic availability, though null association between delay and outcomes persisted after adjustment. Conclusions: TTD in this cohort is shorter than global benchmarks and comparable to recent Asian data. Diagnostic delay did not predict adverse outcomes, though limited surgical events and short follow-up preclude definitive conclusions. Multiple factors beyond healthcare system architecture may contribute, and larger multicenter studies are needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Swaid et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc6f7dee9eb8c0dce7d00https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2026.00032
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper