PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Radiotherapy with or without concurrent cetuximab in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma – A pooled analysis from two ARTSCAN trials

GAGabriel AdrianPNP NilssonSFSigne Friesland

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the impact of adding cetuximab to radiotherapy on loco-regional control in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Included patients from two randomized ARTSCAN trials: RT alone with 68 Gy and RT plus cetuximab.
  • Used univariable and adjusted Cox regression models for comparisons.
  • Follow-up duration was 5.3 years with a total of 163 patients.
  • Five-year loco-regional control was 84% for RT alone and 82% for RT plus cetuximab.
  • The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.18 (95% CI 0.54–2.6, p = 0.70), indicating no significant difference.
  • No evidence supports cetuximab as a radiosensitizer in this patient population.

Abstract

AbstractBackground The radiosensitizing effect of epidermal growth factor inhibitors (EGFRIs), such as cetuximab, in patients with p16-positive HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC) is not clear. There is no randomized trial investigating the addition of EGFRI to radiotherapy (RT) alone specifically in HPV + OPSCC, and available evidence in subgroup analyses have mostly suggested discouraging results. The current analysis provides additional data by combining results from two randomized trials. Materials and Methods Patients from two randomized ARTSCAN trials were included. The RT alone-group consisted of patients treated with conventionally fractionated RT (68.0 Gy in 34 fractions over 6.5 weeks) in the first ARTSCAN trial. The cetuximab group comprised patients treated with conventionally fractionated RT (same RT-schedule) and receiving concurrent cetuximab in the ARTSCAN III trial. Only patients with HPV + OPSCC were included. Comparisons between groups were made by univariable and adjusted Cox regression models, and illustrated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results 74 and 89 patients were eligible in the first ARTSCAN trial (RT alone) and ARTSCAN III (RT + cetuximab), respectively, with a median follow-up of 5.3 (interquartile range 5.0–5.5) years. Baseline characteristics were generally well-balanced. The five-year loco-regional control for RT alone was 84% (95%CI 76–93) and for RT + cetuximab 82% (95%CI 75–91), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.18 (95%CI 0.54–2.6, p = 0.70). Interpretation The study does not support a radiosensitizing role when adding EGFRI cetuximab to RT in patients with HPV + OPSCC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adrian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc6f7dee9eb8c0dce7d83https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2026.101202
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of the prognosis of down-staging human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using cetuximab combined with radiotherapy instead of cisplatin combined with radiotherapy2024
  2. 2The KRAS-variant and cetuximab in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer – results from the NRG/RTOG 1016 trial2026
  3. 3Real world efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.2026
  4. 4Matched-Pair Analysis of Survival in the Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Radiotherapy or Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Surgical-Based Treatment2025
  5. 5Cetuximab in combination with immunotherapy and chemotherapy as preoperative induction therapy for locally advanced HNSCC: A retrospective study.2026