PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Analysis1 citations

Inquiry and deception

View Full Paper
YSYasha SapirBHBrian Haas

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore what it means to be deceived and how inquiry affects deception.
  • Discuss the intuitive settling proposal regarding deception and skepticism.
  • Examine the relationship between inquiry and susceptibility to deception.
  • Victims of deception tend to settle on incorrect answers to questions.
  • Skeptical individuals are less likely to be deceived compared to those who are non-skeptical.
  • The proposal suggests that increased inquiry can help individuals avoid deception.

Abstract

Abstract We all have been deceived, whether by politicians, pundits or peers. Likely more often than we would wish to admit. But what is it to be deceived? As we argue, victims of deception settle on a false answer to a question. This settling proposal not only makes good on the intuitive idea that sceptical agents are harder to deceive than their non-sceptical peers, but also finds support in the infelicity of reporting an agent as both inquiring and deceived. Want to avoid being duped? Our proposal provides an answer: inquire further, don’t settle.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sapir et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc6f7dee9eb8c0dce7dcbhttps://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anag031
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper