PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Acta Oncologica0 citationsOpen Access

Oncological outcome and immune-checkpoint-blockade-induced toxicities in patients with cervical cancer – a Norwegian real-world cohort

KBKatharina BischofKFKeira Matallah FredriksenMBMaren Bjørnstad

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate oncological outcomes and treatment tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical cancer patients.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 57 patients treated with ICIs between 2016 and 2024.
  • Patients received ICIs alone or in combination with chemotherapy at Oslo University Hospital.
  • Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival.
  • Cohort 1 (ICI + chemotherapy) had a median PFS of 12.4 months (95% CI: 9.0-15.7) and median OS of 27.5 months (95% CI: 18.0-37.1).
  • Cohort 2 (ICI alone) had a median PFS of 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.0) and median OS of 9.3 months (95% CI: 4.3-14.4).
  • 16% of patients discontinued treatment due to toxicities.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer has been shown to significantly prolong survival. In this study, we examined the clinical outcomes and tolerability of treatment with ICIs in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer in a real-world setting in Norway. Patient/material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with an ICI in combination with chemotherapy or as single agent at Oslo University Hospital between 2016 and 2024. The primary oncological endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS) as well as tolerability. RESULTS: We included 57 patients with a median age of 53 years and a median follow-up of 15.2 months. Thirty-five patients were treated with an ICI in combination with chemotherapy (cohort 1), and or an ICI alone (n = 22) (cohort 2). Forty-six patients (81%) were treated for recurrent disease. In cohort 1, the median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 9.0-15.7), and the median OS was 27.5 months (95% CI: 18.0-37.1). In cohort 2, the median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.0), and the median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 4.3-14.4). Nine patients (16%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Our real-world data on the use of ICIs alone or in combination showed antitumour efficacy comparable to that reported in clinical studies in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Our discontinuation rate highlights that toxicity management and mitigation are paramount when novel drugs are introduced in clinical algorithms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bischof et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc6f7dee9eb8c0dce7df3https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2026.45737
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1First-Line Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy Versus Placebo + Chemotherapy for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results of KEYNOTE-8262023 · 257 citations
  2. 2Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up2022 · 1,266 citations
  3. 3Improved Survival with Bevacizumab in Advanced Cervical Cancer2014 · 1,523 citations
  4. 4Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update2021 · 2,171 citations
  5. 51258MO Low dose versus standard dose pembrolizumab for treatment of stage IV stage non-small cell lung carcinoma: Results of the pre-planned interim analysis of the NVALT-30 clinical trial2024 · 27 citations