PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Learning Closed-Form Equations for Subgrid-Scale Closures From High-Fidelity Data: Promises and Challenges

KJKaran JakharYGYifei GuanRMRambod Mojgani

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop closed-form equations for parameterizing subgrid-scale closures in Earth systems using high-fidelity data.
  • Applied equation-discovery techniques to filtered direct numerical simulations of 2D turbulence and Rayleigh-Bénard convection.
  • Identified nonlinear combinations of gradients for momentum and heat flux closures.
  • Compared results using different filtering techniques like Gaussian and box filters.
  • Discovered closures aligned with nonlinear gradient model with high correlation (>0.95) to true fluxes.
  • Identified instabilities in large-eddy simulations with NGM closures due to zero kinetic energy transfer.
  • Proposed adjustments using physics-informed libraries to enhance closure predictions.

Abstract

There is growing interest in discovering interpretable, closed-form equations for subgrid-scale (SGS) closures/parameterizations of complex processes in Earth systems. Here, we apply a common equation-discovery technique with expansive libraries to learn closures from filtered direct numerical simulations of 2D turbulence and Rayleigh-Bénard convection (RBC). Across common filters (e.g., Gaussian, box), we robustly discover closures of the same form for momentum and heat fluxes. These closures depend on nonlinear combinations of gradients of filtered variables, with constants that are independent of the fluid/flow properties and only depend on filter type/size. We show that these closures are the nonlinear gradient model (NGM), which is derivable analytically using Taylor-series. Indeed, we suggest that with common (physics-free) equation-discovery algorithms, for many common systems/physics, discovered closures are consistent with the leading term of the Taylor-series (except when cutoff filters are used). Like previous studies, we find that large-eddy simulations with NGM closures are unstable, despite significant similarities between the true and NGM-predicted fluxes (correlations >0.95). We identify two shortcomings as reasons for these instabilities: in 2D, NGM produces zero kinetic energy transfer between resolved and subgrid scales, lacking both diffusion and backscattering. In RBC, potential energy backscattering is poorly predicted. Moreover, we show that SGS fluxes diagnosed from data, presumed the "truth" for discovery, depend on filtering procedures and are not unique. Accordingly, to learn accurate, stable closures in future work, we propose several ideas around using physics-informed libraries, loss functions, and metrics. These findings are relevant to closure modeling of any multi-scale system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jakhar et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc718dee9eb8c0dce7fechttps://doi.org/10.6082/tqgh6-k3y90
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper