PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Eskisehir Medical Journal Eskisehir City Hospital0 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence and Radiology: Medical Students Attitudes and Its Impact on Radiology Specialty Choice

HYHüseyin Gökhan YavaşMKMehmet KorkmazEEEmre Emekli

Key Points

  • This study investigates medical students' perceptions of artificial intelligence in radiology and its effect on specialty choice.
  • Descriptive cross-sectional survey conducted with 538 medical students from various faculties in Türkiye.
  • Questionnaire assessed perceptions of AI's demographics, risks, advantages, and impact on career choices.
  • Non-parametric statistical analyses examined differences among subgroups based on educational background and experience.
  • Participants generally view AI as a complementary tool, acknowledging its role in reducing diagnostic errors.
  • Clinical students and those with AI exposure had more nuanced views on AI's limitations and automation in interventional radiology.
  • Interest in radiology correlates with knowledge of AI, indicating a need for curriculum integration on this topic.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate medical students' perceptions of the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology and to analyze potential correlations between these perceptions and variables such as academic level, prior technical exposure, completion of a radiology internship, and future specialty interests. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was done with 538 medical students from different faculties in Türkiye. The questionnaire was designed to ascertain students' perceptions regarding AI's demographics, potential risks and clinical advantages, ethical considerations, and its anticipated impact on their career trajectories. Non-parametric statistical analyses were utilized to discern potential differences among subgroups according to their educational background and technical experience. Results: Participants generally viewed AI as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for radiologists, reaching a consensus on its potential to reduce diagnostic errors. Students in clinical years and those with prior AI exposure showed more nuanced perspectives on the technology's limitations. People also thought that interventional radiology was less likely to be fully automated. Individuals interested in the specialty were more inclined to possess knowledge of AI and believe that structured curriculum integration was essential. Conclusion: Medical students primarily perceive AI as a supplementary clinical tool rather than a direct replacement. Doctors' knowledge, ethical rules, and help from the government are likely all important for successful integration. Adding AI-related topics to radiology education could help future doctors make smart career choices as the field changes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yavaş et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc730dee9eb8c0dce814ehttps://doi.org/10.48176/esmj.2026.258
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper