PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Bali Journal of Anesthesiology0 citationsOpen Access

The Trendelenburg Maneuver versus Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in High-Risk Postoperative Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Parallel-Group Study

View Full Paper
FEFatma M. ElaiashySASalah El-den Ebrahim AlsherifHEHala Mohey El-Deen Mohamed El-Gendy

Key Points

  • This study investigates the effectiveness of Trendelenburg maneuver compared to passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness in high-risk postoperative surgical patients.
  • Randomized controlled trial design involving 60 high-risk postoperative surgical patients
  • Patients were assigned to receive either Trendelenburg maneuver or passive leg raising
  • Hemodynamic assessments were performed at baseline and 1 minute after the intervention
  • Both techniques resulted in significant improvements in VTI, stroke volume, and cardiac output with no significant group differences
  • Fluid responsiveness was similar: TM 40% and PLR 46.7%
  • Predicted fluid responsiveness effectively with area under the curve 0.944 for TM and 0.996 for PLR, P=0.228

Abstract

Abstract Background: Optimizing intravascular volume in high-risk postoperative surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) requires a reliable assessment of fluid responsiveness, yet commonly used methods have important limitations. Passive leg raising (PLR) is well validated but may be impractical or contraindicated in certain clinical scenarios. The Trendelenburg maneuver (TM) produces a similar preload challenge, but its diagnostic performance in high-risk postoperative patients remains uncertain. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled 60 high-risk postoperative surgical patients with hypoperfusion in the ICU. Participants were randomly allocated to undergo either TM or PLR. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables, including velocity–time integral (VTI), stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), and capillary refill time (CRT), were measured at baseline and 1 min after the assigned maneuver. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in SV or VTI >10%. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Both TM and PLR produced significant increases in VTI, SV, and CO, along with significant reductions in CRT, with no significant differences between groups. The proportion of fluid responders was similar between TM (40%) and PLR (46.7%). Percentage change in VTI reliably predicted fluid responsiveness in both groups, with an area under the curve of 0.944 for TM and 0.996 for PLR ( P = 0.228). A significant inverse correlation was observed between CRT and percentage change in VTI ( r = −0.268, P = 0.038). Conclusions: TM demonstrates diagnostic performance comparable with PLR for predicting fluid responsiveness in high-risk postoperative surgical ICU patients. TM may represent a practical alternative when PLR was contraindicated or infeasible, supporting more individualized hemodynamic management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elaiashy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc730dee9eb8c0dce81b9https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_317_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper