PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology0 citationsOpen Access

The hematoma measurement accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography angiography in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

View Full Paper
BZBaoteng ZhangQHQingjing HuangFWFeijian Wu

Key Points

  • This research investigates the accuracy of hematoma measurements from dual-energy computed tomography angiography compared to non-contrast computed tomography.
  • Retrospective study of 129 patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage who underwent NCCT and DECTA scans.
  • Hematomas categorized by volume and morphology; measurements analyzed using various statistical methods including regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
  • Deviation percentages calculated for volume, surface area, and surface regularity relative to NCCT as reference.
  • Hematoma volume measurements from DECTA show good agreement with NCCT (values ≥ 0.085).
  • DECTA-derived surface regularity measurements are significantly lower than NCCT measurements.
  • Accuracy of volume measurement is higher for DECTA conventional CTA in large hematomas (> 60 mL).

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of hematoma volume (V), surface area (S), and surface regularity (SR) measured on dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA), using non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) as the reference standard. METHODS: A total of 129 patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) who underwent both NCCT and DECTA scans were retrospectively studied. Patients were stratified by V: Group 1 ( 60 mL); and by morphology: regular, irregular, and lobular. DECTA data were post-processed to generate conventional computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 60 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI). These, along with NCCT images, were imported into 3D Slicer software to obtain V and S; SR was subsequently calculated. Deviation percentages (ΔV, ΔS, ΔSR) of conventional CTA and 60 keV VMI relative to NCCT were calculated. We assessed correlations using simple linear regression, compared different modalities with unpaired t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, evaluated agreement via Bland-Altman analysis, and compared deviation percentages across groups using one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis H tests. Inter-reader consistency was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: values ≥ 0.085). CONCLUSION: Hematoma volume measurements from DECTA show good agreement with NCCT measurements, suggesting potential utility for follow-up assessment in certain clinical scenarios. However, DECTA-derived SR measurements are significantly lower than those from NCCT. Volume measurement accuracy of conventional CTA was higher for large hematomas (> 60 mL). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Accurate hematoma measurement is crucial for prognosis and management in sICH. This study indicates that V measurements from DECTA are comparable to those from NCCT in certain clinical scenarios, offering potential added value when CTA is clinically indicated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc730dee9eb8c0dce81e6https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2026.263859
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in distinguishing intracerebral hemorrhage from contrast staining: a systematic review and meta-analysis with radiation dose assessment2026
  2. 2Retrospective validation of 3D Slicer against CTA source images for accurate intracerebral hematoma volumetry: a comparative study with the Tada formula2025
  3. 3Clinical utility of consecutive volume scanning dual‐energy CT in differentiating hemorrhage from contrast staining in ischemic stroke patients2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Volumetric Assessment of Traumatic Intracranial Hematomas: Is ABC/2 Reliable?2024 · 12 citations
  5. 5Diagnostic efficacy of dual energy CT in differentiating intracerebral hemorrhage from iodinated contrast material staining2024