PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of Hypertension0 citations

High Rate of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure Despite Multidrug Therapy in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patients

View Full Paper
KLKarel LábrLFLukas Filka

Key Result

Uncontrolled admission blood pressure was present in 33.7% of elective PCI patients, who received fewer antihypertensive classes and less often diuretics (32.9% vs. 46.7%; p=0.008).

Key Points

  • To analyze blood pressure control and antihypertensive therapy in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
  • Retrospective cohort of 433 consecutive patients in 2019 undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
  • Assessed blood pressure and antihypertensive therapy at admission, defining uncontrolled blood pressure by standard criteria.
  • Evaluated dose intensity of antihypertensive drugs based on medical history.
  • 33.7% of patients exhibited uncontrolled blood pressure at admission (146/433).
  • Patients with uncontrolled blood pressure received fewer antihypertensive classes (2.33 vs. 2.64; p=0.022).
  • 28.2% of patients showed apparent treatment resistant hypertension (122/433).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=433)

Structured PICO

P
Population
433 patients (mean age 73.3 years, 24% female) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic coronary syndrome.
O
Outcome
Admission blood pressure control (uncontrolled defined as systolic ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥90 mmHg) and baseline antihypertensive therapy (drug choices and dose intensity).surrogate

A high proportion of patients undergoing elective PCI have uncontrolled blood pressure and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension despite multidrug therapy, highlighting a need for regimen optimization.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 32.9% vs 46.7%

p-value: p=0.008

Abstract

Objective: To describe admission blood pressure control and baseline antihypertensive therapy, including drug choices and dose intensity, in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Design and method: Retrospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic coronary syndrome in 2019 (433 patients). Uncontrolled blood pressure was defined as systolic at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic at least 90 mmHg. Baseline antihypertensive therapy and daily doses were obtained from medical history; missing entries were treated as not prescribed. Dose intensity was low (up to 25 percent), medium (26 to 99 percent) or high (100 percent or more) of maximal recommended daily dose. Results: Mean age was 73.3 ± 9.9 years and 329 (76.0%) were men. Mean admission blood pressure was 131.9 ± 15.6/77.0 ± 8.6 mmHg; uncontrolled blood pressure was present in 146/433 (33.7%). Baseline therapy included beta-blockers 327/433 (75.5%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 240/433 (55.4%), angiotensin receptor blockers 90/433 (20.8%), calcium channel blockers 155/433 (35.8%), diuretics 182/433 (42.0%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 69/433 (15.9%). Median number of antihypertensive classes was 3 (interquartile range 2 to 3); 217/433 (50.1%) received three or more classes and 105/433 (24.2%) four or more classes. Apparent treatment resistant hypertension was present in 122/433 (28.2%). Predominant molecules were bisoprolol (148/327; 45.3% of beta-blocker users), metoprolol prolonged release (91/327; 27.8%), perindopril arginine (103/240; 42.9%), ramipril (93/240; 38.8%), and amlodipine (117/155; 75.5%). Among patients with available dose data, high dose intensity was observed in 31/317 (9.8%) beta-blockers, 61/224 (27.2%) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 36/83 (43.4%) angiotensin receptor blockers and 59/134 (44.0%) calcium channel blockers. Patients with uncontrolled blood pressure received fewer antihypertensive classes (2.33 ± 1.32 vs. 2.64 ± 1.30; p=0.022) and less often diuretics (32.9% vs. 46.7%; p=0.008). Conclusions: In elective percutaneous coronary intervention patients, uncontrolled admission blood pressure and apparent treatment resistant hypertension were common. Optimisation of regimen composition and dose intensity may improve blood pressure control in this very-high-risk population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lábr et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in chronic coronary syndrome undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n=433). Uncontrolled blood pressure vs. Controlled blood pressure was evaluated on Use of diuretics (p=0.008). Uncontrolled admission blood pressure was present in 33.7% of elective PCI patients, who received fewer antihypertensive classes and less often diuretics (32.9% vs. 46.7%; p=0.008).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc756dee9eb8c0dce82fehttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001196604.77770.a0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Importance of Therapy Intensification and Medication Nonadherence for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Coronary Disease2008 · 146 citations
  2. 2Most individuals with treated blood pressures above target receive only one or two antihypertensive drug classes2012 · 15 citations
  3. 3Effect of intensive structured care on individual blood pressure targets in primary care: multicentre randomised controlled trial2012 · 104 citations
  4. 4Determinants of poor hypertension management in patients with ischaemic heart disease2005 · 33 citations
  5. 5Adequacy of blood pressure control in high-risk hypertensive patients: The DEGREE study2022 · 10 citations