PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Big Data and Cognitive Computing0 citationsOpen Access

Output Correction of Recurrence-Aware Long-Term Cognitive Network Classifiers

View Full Paper
GNGonzalo NápolesIGIsel GrauYSYamisleydi Salgueiro

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance the performance of recurrence-aware long-term cognitive network classifiers in tabular pattern classification tasks.
  • Developed four gradient-based correction methods for output logits post-training.
  • Focused on maximizing F1 score instead of calibrated probabilities.
  • Evaluated using real-world datasets to assess performance improvements.
  • Incorporating a correction layer significantly enhanced performance metrics.
  • Occasional reduction in precision observed amid improvements in other metrics.

Abstract

Recurrence-Aware Long-Term Cognitive Network (rLTCN) classifiers have reported comparable performance to mainstream black-box models, including tree ensembles and support vector machines, in tabular pattern classification tasks. These classifiers use a two-step learning algorithm to address issues that arise during the training of recurrent neural networks. While the weights in the recurrent block are computed using unsupervised learning, recurrence-aware weights are determined using a one-step learning rule based on the Moore-Penrose inverse. However, the related least-squares learning problem tends to favor easy instances and common patterns, particularly those associated with the majority class in imbalanced datasets. In such scenarios, a loss function that directly optimizes a robust metric, such as the F1 score, would lead to models with stronger generalization capabilities. Unfortunately, incorporating such a metric into the Moore-Penrose inverse learning procedure presents challenges from a mathematical viewpoint. In this paper, we propose four gradient-based correction methods that modify the output logits of rLTCN classifiers once the two-step training process is done. Inspired by procedures such as Platt or Beta scaling, the proposed post-optimization correction methods seek to maximize the F1 score rather than produce calibrated probabilities. The simulations using real-world datasets show that adding a correction layer to rLTCNs improves their performance significantly at the expense of occasional reductions in the precision metric.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nápoles et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc76ddee9eb8c0dce84a6https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc10060178
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Backpropagation through time learning for recurrence-aware long-term cognitive networks2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Adaptive Rentention & Correction for Continual Learning2024
  3. 3Fixed Random Classifier Rearrangement for Continual Learning2024
  4. 4Learning Wisdom from Errors: Promoting LLM's Continual Relation Learning through Exploiting Error Cases2025
  5. 5Long Short-term Cognitive Networks: An Empirical Performance Study2024