PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2022BMJ Global Health63 citationsOpen Access

Overdiagnosis and overuse of diagnostic and screening tests in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review

LALoai AlbarqouniMAMorteza Arab‐ZozaniEAEman Abukmail

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Overdiagnosis and overuse of healthcare services harm individuals, take resources that could be used to address underuse, and threaten the sustainability of health systems. These problems are attracting increasing attention in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Unaware of any review of relevant evidence, we conducted a scoping review of the evidence around overdiagnosis and overuse of diagnostic and screening tests in LMICs. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Global Index Medicus for relevant studies published until 24 May 2021, with no restrictions on date or language. We categorised included studies by major focus (overdiagnosis, overuse of tests, or both) and main themes (presence or estimates of extent; drivers; consequences and solutions). RESULTS: We identified 2763 unique records and included 162 articles reporting on 154 studies across 55 countries, involving over 2. 8 million participants and/or requests for tests. Almost half the studies focused on overdiagnosis (70; 45. 5%), one-third on overuse of tests (61; 39. 6%) and one-fifth on both (23; 14. 9%). Common overdiagnosed conditions included malaria (61; 39. 6%) and thyroid cancer (25; 16. 2%), estimated to be >70% in China. Overused tests included imaging (n=25 studies) such as CT and MRI; laboratory investigations (n=18) such as serological tests and tumour markers; and procedures (n=14) such as colonoscopy. Drivers included fear of conflict with patients and expanding disease definitions. Common consequences included unnecessary treatments such as antimalarials, and wasted resources, with costs of malaria overdiagnosis estimated at US86 million in Sudan in 1 year alone. Only 9% of studies discussed solutions, which included addressing inappropriately lowered diagnostic thresholds and reforming test-ordering processes. CONCLUSIONS: Overdiagnosis and overuse of tests are widespread in LMICs and generate significant harm and waste. Better understanding of the problems and robust evaluation of solutions is needed, informed by a new global alliance of researchers and policy-makers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Albarqouni et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fce2dbef5c75a86e5f31ahttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008696
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The doctor–patient relationship, defensive medicine and overprescription in Chinese public hospitals: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey in Shenzhen city2014 · 237 citations
  2. 2Rapid diagnostic tests compared with malaria microscopy for guiding outpatient treatment of febrile illness in Tanzania: randomised trial2007 · 439 citations
  3. 3“Appropriateness of colonoscopy according to EPAGE II in a low resource setting: a cross sectional study from Sri Lanka”2018 · 9 citations
  4. 4Global patterns and trends in incidence and mortality of thyroid cancer in children and adolescents: a population-based study2021 · 168 citations
  5. 5The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care Quality Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality1998 · 1,270 citations