PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2013Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology80 citationsOpen Access

Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease

View Full Paper
ASAndrea SarkozyMTMichifumi TokudaUTUsha B. Tedrow

Key Result

Epicardial ablation for postinfarction ventricular tachycardia was associated with a 54% VT recurrence rate, compared with 47% for endocardial-only ablation (P=0.35).

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy of epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients post-myocardial infarction.
  • Reviewed records of 444 consecutive patients with ventricular tachycardia due to prior infarctions.
  • Performed 600 catheter ablation procedures, with epicardial approaches in 56 patients.
  • Evaluated epicardial targets and outcomes in the electrophysiology laboratory.
  • Epicardial ablation abolished at least one ventricular tachycardia in 27 patients (6% of total).
  • 54% of patients who underwent epicardial ablation experienced ventricular tachycardia recurrence compared to 47% in endocardial-only ablation (P=0.35).
  • Major complications occurred in 14% of epicardial procedures performed in the electrophysiology laboratory.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=444)

Structured PICO

Does epicardial ablation reduce VT recurrence compared to endocardial-only ablation in patients with postinfarction VT?

P
Population
444 consecutive patients with ventricular tachycardia due to prior myocardial infarction referred for catheter ablation procedures.
E
Exposure
Epicardial ablation (percutaneous or surgical)
C
Comparator
Endocardial-only ablation
O
Outcome
VT recurrence after the first procedurehard clinical

Epicardial ablation is potentially useful in postinfarction VT, though recurrence rates remain similar to endocardial-only ablation.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 54% vs 47%

p-value: p=0.35

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epicardial approaches have increased ablation success in nonischemic cardiomyopathy, but the use for postinfarction ventricular tachycardias (VT) is less clear. We report the findings for epicardial VT ablation in postinfarct patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Records of 444 consecutive patients with VT because of prior infarction referred for 600 catheter ablation procedures were reviewed. Epicardial procedures were performed in the electrophysiology laboratory in 56 (13%) patients using percutaneous (43 patients) or surgical (13 patients) epicardial access. In 7 patients, epicardial ablation was performed surgically in the operating room. In the electrophysiology laboratory epicardial VT targets were identified in 38 (68%) patients and epicardial ablation abolished ≥1 VT in 27 patients (6% of the total study population); inducibility was not tested after ablation in 4, and VT remained inducible in 7 patients. No ablation was performed in 18 (32%) patients because of no accessible epicardial target or a complication. Major complications occurred in 8 (14%) of the 57 electrophysiology laboratory procedures. After the first procedure any VT recurred in 21 (54%) of 39 patients who had epicardial ablation compared with 164 (47%) of 347 endocardial-only ablation patients (P=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Epicardial ablation is potentially useful in ≥6% of the postinfarction VT population, but the number could be substantially greater because more than two thirds of patients selected for epicardial mapping after failed ablation had an epicardial VT target. Successful epicardial ablation of a VT was not predictable from infarct location or other patient characteristics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sarkozy et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Postinfarction ventricular tachycardia (n=444). Epicardial ablation vs. Endocardial-only ablation was evaluated on VT recurrence after the first procedure (p=0.35). Epicardial ablation for postinfarction ventricular tachycardia was associated with a 54% VT recurrence rate, compared with 47% for endocardial-only ablation (P=0.35).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fd57cf3cec84e9a516bfdhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circep.113.000467
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper