PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1998ETS Research Report Series317 citationsOpen Access

A Bayesian Random Effects Model for Testlets

View Full Paper
EBEric T. BradlowHWHoward WainerXWXiaohui Wang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Standard item response theory (IRT) models fit to dichotomous examination responses ignore the fact that sets of items (testlets) often come from a single common stimuli (e.g. a reading comprehension passage). In this setting, all items given to an examinee are unlikely to be conditionally independent (given examinee proficiency). Models that assume conditional independence will overestimate the precision with which examinee proficiency is measured. Overstatement of precision may lead to inaccurate inferences such as prematurely ending an examination in which the stopping rule is based on the estimated standard error of examinee proficiency (e.g an adaptive test). To model examinations that may be a mixture of independent items and testlets, we modified one standard IRT model to include an additional random effect for items nested within the same testlet. We use a Bayesian framework to facilitate posterior inference via a Data Augmented Gibbs Sampler (DAGS, Tanner and Wong 1987). The modified and standard IRT models are both applied to a data set from a disclosed form of the SAT. We also provide simulation results that indicates that the degree of precision bias is a function of the variability of the testlet effects, as well as the testlet design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bradlow et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fddaad4e6d35897049940https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1998.tb01752.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper