PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2000Monthly Weather Review25 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of Model Fluxes with Surface and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Observations

View Full Paper
FCFrédéric ChevallierJMJ-J. Morcrette

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The global observation network of the atmospheric broadband radiation reached an unprecedent extent in 1998 with the simultaneous availability of longwave and shortwave measurements of the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System instrument on board the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission spacecraft, and of a number of surface stations as part of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement, Baseline Surface Radiation Network, and Surface Radiation network programs. In this paper, these observations are used to assess the quality of the longwave and shortwave components of both the top-of-the-atmosphere and the surface radiation budget computed by the ECMWF operational forecast system. The main features of the boundary radiation are well captured by the system. Clouds appear to be the main modulator of the uncertainty of the top-of-the-atmosphere radiation and of the shortwave surface radiation. This is explained by both model cloud deficiencies and inadequate cloud representation in the radiative transfer schemes. The longwave surface radiation uncertainty is marked by a clear sky bias, common to most of the parameterized longwave radiative transfer models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chevallier et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fdf1617bd4d7ccf049a38https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<3839:comfws>2.0.co;2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper