PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2016EP Europace118 citationsOpen Access

Smart detection of atrial fibrillation

View Full Paper
LKLian KrivosheiSWStefan WeberTBThilo Burkard

Key Result

A smartphone app using the camera and LED light discriminated between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm with 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity using SD1/SD2 index and nRMSSD.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=80)

Structured PICO

Does a novel smartphone app using plethysmographic sensors accurately differentiate between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm in patients?

P
Population
80 patients (40 in atrial fibrillation and 40 in sinus rhythm) evaluated for arrhythmia detection using a smartphone camera.
E
Exposure
Novel smartphone App using the plethysmographic sensor (camera lens and LED light) of an iPhone 4S to record a 5 min video on the index fingertip, analyzing RR intervals via nRMSSD, Shannon entropy, and SD1/SD2 index
C
Comparator
Known rhythm status (atrial fibrillation vs sinus rhythm)
O
Outcome
Sensitivity and specificity for discrimination between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythmsurrogate

A smartphone app using the camera and LED to detect pulse waves can accurately discriminate between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm with 95% sensitivity and specificity.

Abstract

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, and its paroxysmal nature makes its detection challenging. In this trial, we evaluated a novel App for its accuracy to differentiate between patients in AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR) using the plethysmographic sensor of an iPhone 4S and the integrated LED only. METHODS AND RESULTS: For signal acquisition, we used an iPhone 4S, positioned with the camera lens and LED light on the index fingertip. A 5 min video file was recorded with the pulse wave extracted from the green light spectrum of the signal. RR intervals were automatically identified. For discrimination between AF and SR, we tested three different statistical methods. Normalized root mean square of successive difference of RR intervals (nRMSSD), Shannon entropy (ShE), and SD1/SD2 index extracted from a Poincaré plot. Eighty patients were included in the study (40 patients in AF and 40 patients in SR at the time of examination). For discrimination between AF and SR, ShE yielded the highest sensitivity and specificity with 85 and 95%, respectively. Applying a tachogram filter resulted in an improved sensitivity of 87.5%, when combining ShE and nRMSSD, while specificity remained stable at 95%. A combination of SD1/SD2 index and nRMSSD led to further improvement and resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The algorithm tested reliably discriminated between SR and AF based on pulse wave signals from a smartphone camera only. Implementation of this algorithm into a smartwatch is the next logical step.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krivoshei et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=80). Smartphone App using plethysmographic sensor was evaluated on Discrimination between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. A smartphone app using the camera and LED light discriminated between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm with 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity using SD1/SD2 index and nRMSSD.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ff1423f3a87967f2e5c0ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw125
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper