PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 23, 2015Water Resources Research227 citationsOpen Access

A novel framework for discharge uncertainty quantification applied to 500 UK gauging stations

View Full Paper
GCGemma CoxonJFJim FreerIWIda Westerberg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Benchmarking the quality of river discharge data and understanding its information content for hydrological analyses is an important task for hydrologic science. There is a wide variety of techniques to assess discharge uncertainty. However, few studies have developed generalized approaches to quantify discharge uncertainty. This study presents a generalized framework for estimating discharge uncertainty at many gauging stations with different errors in the stage‐discharge relationship. The methodology utilizes a nonparametric LOWESS regression within a novel framework that accounts for uncertainty in the stage‐discharge measurements, scatter in the stage‐discharge data and multisection rating curves. The framework was applied to 500 gauging stations in England and Wales and we evaluated the magnitude of discharge uncertainty at low, mean and high flow points on the rating curve. The framework was shown to be robust, versatile and able to capture place‐specific uncertainties for a number of different examples. Our study revealed a wide range of discharge uncertainties (10–397% discharge uncertainty interval widths), but the majority of the gauging stations (over 80%) had mean and high flow uncertainty intervals of less than 40%. We identified some regional differences in the stage‐discharge relationships, however the results show that local conditions dominated in determining the magnitude of discharge uncertainty at a gauging station. This highlights the importance of estimating discharge uncertainty for each gauging station prior to using those data in hydrological analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coxon et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1ff1dd2065d284090daed8https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr016532
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rating curve estimation under epistemic uncertainty2014 · 118 citations
  2. 2Bayesian Rating Curve Inference as a Streamflow Data Quality Assessment Tool2008 · 59 citations
  3. 3Uncertainty in the estimation of mean annual flood due to rating-curve indefinition1999 · 107 citations
  4. 4Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology2006 · 1,398 citations
  5. 5Rating curve estimation using local stages, upstream discharge data and a simplified hydraulic model1999 · 34 citations