PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 31, 2016View31 citationsOpen Access

Improved ligand geometries in crystallographic refinement usingAFITTinPHENIX

PJPawel A. JanowskiNMNigel W. MoriartyBKBrian Kelley

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Modern crystal structure refinement programs rely on geometry restraints to overcome the challenge of a low data-to-parameter ratio. While the classical Engh and Huber restraints work well for standard amino-acid residues, the chemical complexity of small-molecule ligands presents a particular challenge. Most current approaches either limit ligand restraints to those that can be readily described in the Crystallographic Information File (CIF) format, thus sacrificing chemical flexibility and energetic accuracy, or they employ protocols that substantially lengthen the refinement time, potentially hindering rapid automated refinement workflows. PHENIX-AFITT refinement uses a full molecular-mechanics force field for user-selected small-molecule ligands during refinement, eliminating the potentially difficult problem of finding or generating high-quality geometry restraints. It is fully integrated with a standard refinement protocol and requires practically no additional steps from the user, making it ideal for high-throughput workflows. PHENIX-AFITT refinements also handle multiple ligands in a single model, alternate conformations and covalently bound ligands. Here, the results of combining AFITT and the PHENIX software suite on a data set of 189 protein-ligand PDB structures are presented. Refinements using PHENIX-AFITT significantly reduce ligand conformational energy and lead to improved geometries without detriment to the fit to the experimental data. For the data presented, PHENIX-AFITT refinements result in more chemically accurate models for small-molecule ligands.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Janowski et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a200ce3c1b320180d0dda2dhttps://doi.org/10.1107/s2059798316012225
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The crystallographic information file (CIF): a new standard archive file for crystallography1991 · 600 citations
  2. 2Merck molecular force field. IV. conformational energies and geometries for MMFF941996 · 912 citations
  3. 3New parameters for the refinement of nucleic acid-containing structures1996 · 253 citations
  4. 4Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement1991 · 2,499 citations
  5. 5Table for Estimating the Goodness of Fit of Empirical Distributions1948 · 2,049 citations