PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Biomedical Journal1 citationsOpen Access

Problematic ChatGPT Use: Manifestations, Etiologies, and Evaluation

View Full Paper
HLHui-Yuan LiaoCKChih-Hung KoCYCheng-Fang Yen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background ChatGPT has rapidly permeated various domains, including education, industry, creativity, and daily life. While offering efficiency and emotional engagement, excessive reliance may lead to problematic use with adverse effects on mental health, cognition, and social functioning. This review synthesizes current evidence on manifestations, etiologies, assessment, and neurophysiological correlates of problematic ChatGPT use. Material and Methods A narrative review of empirical studies, psychometric developments, theoretical models, and preliminary electroencephalogram findings was conducted, with cross-cultural comparisons across Taiwan, Turkey, China, Korea, Singapore, and the United States. Results Problematic ChatGPT use is prevalent among young adults and associated with depression, stress, impaired self-control, and functional difficulties. Psychometric tools such as the Problematic ChatGPT Use Scale, Conversational AI Dependence Scale, and Generative AI Dependency Scale provide initial frameworks but require further validation. Theoretical models (Interaction of Person–Affect–Cognition–Execution model, compensatory Internet use, dual-system theory) have been used to explain the roles of emotional regulation deficits, cognitive biases, and intuitive processing for the development of problematic ChatGPT use. Preliminary electroencephalogram studies suggest altered functional connectivity, paralleling digital addiction patterns. Conclusions Problematic ChatGPT use involves psychological, behavioral, and neurobiological mechanisms. Future research should strengthen psychometric validation, expand electroencephalogram investigations, and evaluate interventions such as digital literacy education, behavioral self-regulation, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and neurofeedback to promote healthier AI engagement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a200d423224f8dacd0dd39bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2026.100998
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring short-form video application addiction: Socio-technical and attachment perspectives2019 · 455 citations
  2. 2Development and Validation of a Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS)2013 · 1,690 citations
  3. 3AI-Mediated Communication: Definition, Research Agenda, and Ethical Considerations2019 · 603 citations
  4. 4A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework2005 · 3,032 citations
  5. 5Self-Determination Theory2012 · 2,767 citations