PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 13, 2005The American Journal of Surgical Pathology238 citations

Distribution of Cytokeratins and Vimentin in Adult Renal Neoplasms and Normal Renal Tissue

View Full Paper
BSBrian SkinniderAFAndrew L. FolpeRHRandolph A. Hennigar

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Adult renal epithelial neoplasms (RENs) comprise several distinct clinicopathologic entities with potential prognostic and therapeutic differences. Individual cases can show overlapping morphologic features, necessitating the use of ancillary methods. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of cytokeratin (CK) subtype expression pattern in a wide range of adult RENs. RENs (including clear cell conventional renal cell carcinoma (RCC), papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, renal oncocytoma, collecting duct carcinoma (CDC), renal medullary carcinoma (RMC), urothelial carcinoma, metanephric adenoma (MA), tubulocystic carcinoma (TC) (also known as low-grade collecting duct carcinoma), and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma) were immunostained for CK subtypes (CK5/CK6, 7, 8, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20), high molecular weight CKs 1, 5, 10, 14 (HMWCK), and vimentin (Vim). The expression pattern of normal kidney was also examined and correlated with RENs. Although there is some overlap, subtypes of RENs show distinctive CK expression profiles that may be useful in several differential diagnostic settings. Clear cell RCCs typically showed a restricted expression pattern of CK8, CK18 and Vim. Papillary RCCs typically expressed CK7, CK8, CK18, CK19, and Vim and could be distinguished from MA (CK7-). Chromophobe RCCs were typically CK7+, CK8+, CK18+, and Vim-, and could be distinguished from oncocytomas (typically CK7-). In oncocytomas, nonspecific staining of unblocked endogenous biotin is a potentially significant diagnostic pitfall. CDC, RMC, and TC demonstrated similar CK expression profiles (with the exception of HMWCK expression limited to CDC), supporting a close relationship between these entities. A panel of CK5/CK6, CK17, and Vim may be helpful in distinguishing CDC (typically CK5/CK6-, CK17-, Vim+) and urothelial carcinoma (typically CK5/CK6+, CK17+, Vim-). In conclusion, CK expression patterns may be helpful in several differential diagnostic situations when dealing with adult RENs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Skinnider et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a201299c70a2547a604b014https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000163362.78475.63
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LAPAROSCOPIC CRYOABLATION OF RENAL MASSES2000 · 22 citations
  2. 2Antibodies to Cytokeratin 14 Specifically Identify Oncocytes (H??rthle Cells) in Thyroid Lesions and Tumors1997 · 12 citations
  3. 3Renal Medullary Carcinoma The Seventh Sickle Cell Nephropathy1995 · 607 citations
  4. 4Inhibin Is Not an Immunohistochemical Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Example of the Potential Pitfall in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry Caused by Endogenous Biotin1999 · 44 citations
  5. 5Cytokeratin polypeptide patterns of different epithelia of the human male urogenital tract: immunofluorescence and gel electrophoretic studies.1985 · 171 citations