PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2000The Journals of Gerontology Series A55 citations

Variability of Blood Pressure Response to Orthostatism and Reproducibility of the Diagnosis of Orthostatic Hypotension in Elderly Subjects

View Full Paper
JBJoël BelminMAM. AbderrhamaneSMS. Medjahed

Key Result

Blood pressure response to orthostatism showed significant within-day variability (p < .05) and poor reproducibility for diagnosing orthostatic hypotension (kappa < 0.47) in elderly patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=53)

Structured PICO

Is the diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension reproducible within-day and day-to-day in elderly patients?

P
Population
53 elderly patients (mean age 83.7 years, 81% female) in an intermediate care geriatric ward assessed for orthostatic hypotension variability over one week.
E
Exposure
Blood pressure measurement in the supine position and after 1 and 2 minutes of orthostatism, assessed 4 times on the same day and twice more on another day of the same week
O
Outcome
Within-day and day-to-day variability of the blood pressure response to orthostatism and reproducibility of the diagnosis of orthostatic hypotensionsurrogate

The diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension based on conventional criteria exhibits poor within-day and day-to-day reproducibility in elderly patients, suggesting single measurements may be insufficient.

Main Result

Effect estimate: kappa < 0.47

p-value: p=< .05

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a major problem in the elderly population. Its diagnosis is based on measurement of the blood pressure (BP) response to orthostatism (BPRO). This study investigates the within-day and day-to-day variability of the BPRO and the reproducibility of the diagnosis of OH in this population. METHODS: BP was measured in the supine position and after 1 and 2 minutes of orthostatism in 53 consecutive elderly patients (43 women and 10 men aged 83.7 +/- 9.5 years) of an intermediate care geriatric ward. BPRO was assessed 4 times on the same day (8-9 AM, 10-11 AM, 1-2 PM, and 5-6 PM) and twice more on another day of the same week (8-9 AM and 1-2 PM). RESULTS: There were significant within-day differences between the four orthostatic changes in systolic BP (OCs, supine minus standing systolic BP) after 1 minute or 2 minutes (p < .05). Day-to-day differences between the OCs measured at the same times were not significant. OH defined as an OCs of 20 mm Hg or more at 1 or 2 minutes of orthostatism, was found in ten cases (19%) in the initial set of measurements on the first day. A cumulative diagnosis of OH after the six BPRO tests was found in 23 cases (43%). The reproducibility of the diagnosis of OH was mild or poor (all kappa values were below 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: BPRO exhibits significant within-day variability in elderly patients. Within-day and day-to-day reproducibility of the diagnosis of OH, based on conventional criteria, were found to be poor.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Belmin et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Orthostatic hypotension (n=53). Orthostatism was evaluated on Within-day and day-to-day variability of systolic BP response and reproducibility of OH diagnosis (kappa < 0.47, p=< .05). Blood pressure response to orthostatism showed significant within-day variability (p < .05) and poor reproducibility for diagnosing orthostatic hypotension (kappa < 0.47) in elderly patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a201de110c7171b43fbe119https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/55.11.m667
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper