PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1986Critical Care Medicine66 citations

Evaluation of two different extubation criteria

View Full Paper
CDC. Bryan DeHavenJHJames M. HurstRBRichard D. Branson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We evaluated extubation criteria in 48 postoperative general surgical and trauma patients receiving ventilatory support with intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Extubation criteria based on conventional respiratory mechanics demonstrated at 48% false-negative prediction of outcome, while those based on gas exchange values correctly predicted outcome in 94% of patients. Thus, conventional respiratory-mechanics extubation criteria may prolong mechanical airway and ventilatory support when used with IMV/CPAP in these patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

DeHaven et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2020eb24b5f30be5fbe96chttps://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198602000-00003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper