PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2006Occupational and Environmental Medicine146 citationsOpen Access

Building health: an epidemiological study of “sick building syndrome” in the Whitehall II study

AMA MarmotJEJ. William EleyMSMai Stafford

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sick building syndrome (SBS) is described as a group of symptoms attributed to the physical environment of specific buildings. Isolating particular environmental features responsible for the symptoms has proved difficult. This study explores the role and significance of the physical and psychosocial work environment in explaining SBS. METHODS: Cross sectional data on the physical environment of a selection of buildings were added to individual data from the Whitehall II study--an ongoing health survey of office based civil servants. A self-report questionnaire was used to capture 10 symptoms of the SBS and psychosocial work stress. In total, 4052 participants aged 42-62 years working in 44 buildings were included in this study. RESULTS: No significant relation was found between most aspects of the physical work environment and symptom prevalence, adjusted for age, sex, and employment grade. Positive (non-significant) relations were found only with airborne bacteria, inhalable dust, dry bulb temperature, relative humidity, and having some control over the local physical environment. Greater effects were found with features of the psychosocial work environment including high job demands and low support. Only psychosocial work characteristics and control over the physical environment were independently associated with symptoms in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The physical environment of office buildings appears to be less important than features of the psychosocial work environment in explaining differences in the prevalence of symptoms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marmot et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2025c276ec520ee9a1bbf7https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2005.022889
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life1990 · 8,297 citations
  2. 2The office environment survey : a study of building sickness1987 · 40 citations
  3. 3Why do Women Suffer from Sick Building Syndrome more often than Men? - Subjective Higher Sensitivity versus Objective Causes2001 · 152 citations
  4. 4Job control, personal characteristics, and heart disease.1998 · 112 citations
  5. 5The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies.1984 · 378 citations