PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 16, 2011Journal of Clinical Nursing38 citationsOpen Access

Factors influencing the implementation of the guideline Triage in emergency departments: a qualitative study

MJMaaike AP JanssenTATheo van AchterbergMAMarian Adriaansen

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The objectives are: (1) to identify factors that influence the implementation of the guideline Triage in emergency departments 2004 in emergency departments in the Netherlands, and (2) to develop tailored implementation strategies for implementation of this guideline. BACKGROUND: Guideline dissemination is no guarantee for guideline implementation. In 2004 the guideline Triage in Emergency Departments was disseminated in Dutch hospitals. Guideline revision was scheduled in 2008. Prior to the revision, factors which influenced the implementation of the guideline 2004 were studied to be addressed at the implementation of the revised guideline. METHODS: This is an exploratory study using a qualitative design including: a questionnaire sent to all emergency departments in the Netherlands (n = 108): four focus group interviews, including nurses and ward managers and in-depth interviews with ward managers and doctors. Based on the results, tailored implementation strategies and activities were suggested which target the identified influencing factors. RESULTS: Various factors at individual, social context and organisational level were identified as influencing the implementation of the 2004 version of the guideline, namely: level of knowledge; insight and skills; work preferences; motivation and/or commitment; support; informed doctors; preliminary work and arrangements for implementation; description of tasks and responsibilities; workload and resources. Ward managers, nurses and doctors mentioned similar as well as different factors. Consequently, tailored implementation strategies and activities related to education, maintenance of change, motivation and consensus-building, information, organisation and facilitation were suggested. CONCLUSION: Nurses, ward managers and doctors broadly indicated similar influencing factors, although the importance of these factors differed for the different groups. For nurses, resistance and lack of resources are most important, ward managers mentioned culture and doctors the availability of doctors at the emergency department. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Insight into the barriers for implementation and tailoring implementation strategies to these barriers improves the implementation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Janssen et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20357c45d96add4db5ce56https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03921.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Developing evidence‐based practice: experiences of senior and junior clinical nurses2008 · 180 citations
  2. 2Sudden informal caregivers: the lived experience of informal caregivers after an unexpected event2011 · 41 citations
  3. 3Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in self-referred patients in a European emergency department2007 · 95 citations
  4. 4Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice1997 · 830 citations
  5. 5Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?1998 · 418 citations