PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 21, 2020University Heart Journal3 citationsOpen Access

Association of GRACE Risk Score with Angiographic Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Non ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

MRMd Estakur RahmanMSMohammad SafiuddinSHSM Ahsan Habib

Key Result

The GRACE risk score showed a significant positive correlation (r=0.66) with the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease assessed by the Gensini score in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=50)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a higher GRACE risk score predict greater angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome?

P
Population
50 adults (mean age 54.8 years, 18% female) with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, free of prior myocardial infarction or revascularization, who underwent coronary angiography.
E
Exposure
GRACE risk score calculation (stratified into low <108, intermediate 109-140, and high >140 risk groups)
O
Outcome
Correlation between GRACE risk score and angiographic severity of coronary artery disease assessed by Gensini scoresurrogate

The GRACE risk score has a significant positive correlation with the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease in patients with NSTE-ACS, suggesting it can help predict anatomical extension of CAD prior to angiography.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r=0.66

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Small sample size
  • Non-random sampling method
  • Coronary angiography assessed by visual observation without intravascular ultrasonography, risking interobserver variation
  • Non-random sampling method (purposive sampling)
  • Coronary angiography assessed by visual observation without intravascular ultrasonography, leading to potential interobserver variation

Abstract

Background: Due to the wide spectrum of risk for death and recurrent events among patients with NSTE-ACS, management guidelines emphasise the importance of early risk stratification. In addition to prognostic assessment, predicting the anatomical extension of coronary artery disease is potentially useful for clinical decision. The aim of the study is to determine whether the GRACE risk score correlates with the angiographic extent and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with non ST-elevation ACS Methods: A total of 50 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were enrolled to the study. Based on the GRACE risk score classification system, the patients were divided into low (140) risk groups. All patients underwent coronary angiography within five days after admission. The severity of the coronary artery disease was assessed by Gensini score. Relation between Grace score and Gensini score was evaluated. Results: Mean Gensini score were 12.20 ± 13.60, 34.52 ± 13.50 and 48.41 ± 14.56 in low group, intermediate group and high GRACE risk group respectively and the difference of mean Gensini score was statistically significant (p<0.001). A GRACE score of 135 was identified as the optimal cut-off to predict severe CAD (sensitivity = 82.4% and specificity = 75.8%). In our study correlation co-efficient between GRACE risk score and Gensini score was r=0.66 (p<0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that the GRACE risk score has significant positive correlation with coronary artery stenosis in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. University Heart Journal Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan 2021; 38-41

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahman et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Non ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=50). GRACE risk score was evaluated on Correlation between GRACE risk score and Gensini score (r=0.66, p=<0.001). The GRACE risk score showed a significant positive correlation (r=0.66) with the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease assessed by the Gensini score in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a203b9645d96add4db5d6e4https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v17i1.50879
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Validated Prediction Model for All Forms of Acute Coronary Syndrome2004 · 1,599 citations
  2. 2The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation MI2000 · 3,273 citations
  3. 3Predictors of Hospital Mortality in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events2003 · 2,376 citations
  4. 4Coronary artery disease in Bangladesh: A review2013 · 164 citations
  5. 5Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 20152017 · 3,900 citations