PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 29, 2003Journal of Bacteriology226 citationsOpen Access

Physiological Studies of Escherichia coli Strain MG1655: Growth Defects and Apparent Cross-Regulation of Gene Expression

View Full Paper
ESEric SoupèneWHWally C. van HeeswijkJPJacqueline Plumbridge

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Escherichia coli strain MG1655 was chosen for sequencing because the few mutations it carries (ilvG rfb-50 rph-1) were considered innocuous. However, it has a number of growth defects. Internal pyrimidine starvation due to polarity of the rph-1 allele on pyrE was problematic in continuous culture. Moreover, the isolate of MG1655 obtained from the E. coli Genetic Stock Center also carries a large deletion around the fnr (fumarate-nitrate respiration) regulatory gene. Although studies on DNA microarrays revealed apparent cross-regulation of gene expression between galactose and lactose metabolism in the Stock Center isolate of MG1655, this was due to the occurrence of mutations that increased lacY expression and suppressed slow growth on galactose. The explanation for apparent cross-regulation between galactose and N-acetylglucosamine metabolism was similar. By contrast, cross-regulation between lactose and maltose metabolism appeared to be due to generation of internal maltosaccharides in lactose-grown cells and may be physiologically significant. Lactose is of restricted distribution: it is normally found together with maltosaccharides, which are starch degradation products, in the mammalian intestine. Strains designated MG1655 and obtained from other sources differed from the Stock Center isolate and each other in several respects. We confirmed that use of other E. coli strains with MG1655-based DNA microarrays works well, and hence these arrays can be used to study any strain of interest. The responses to nitrogen limitation of two urinary tract isolates and an intestinal commensal strain isolated recently from humans were remarkably similar to those of MG1655.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soupène et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2042683f2ec568b1df6104https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.18.5611-5626.2003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bacterial polysaccharide synthesis and gene nomenclature1996 · 490 citations
  2. 2Loss of “galactose permease” and galactose sensitivity of E. coli associated with mutation in lac operon1969 · 2 citations
  3. 3Control of the expression of the manXYZ operon in Escherichia coli: Mlc is a negative regulator of the mannose PTS1998 · 129 citations
  4. 4LrhA as a new transcriptional key regulator of flagella, motility and chemotaxis genes in Escherichia coli2002 · 237 citations
  5. 5A dominant mutation in the gene for the Nag repressor of Escherichia coli that renders the nag regulon uninducible1992 · 17 citations