PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 27, 2022Aggression and Violent Behavior56 citationsOpen Access

Parent training programs for preventing and treating antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A comprehensive meta-analysis of international studies

View Full Paper
ABAndreas BeelmannLALouisa ArnoldJHJudith Hercher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive meta-analysis of international studies on the effects of parent training programs (PTP) on antisocial behavior (ASB) in children and adolescents. From systematic literature searches of 7219 reports, we finally selected 239 eligible reports with 241 independent studies and 279 comparisons between a program and a control condition up to the publication year 2020. Although most interventions were based on a cognitive-behavioral approach, we also found a great variety of programs and applications. Overall, the mean effect for PTP was positive for parent/family and ASB outcomes (d = 0.46 and d = 0.47, respectively using the random effect model at postintervention). We also found higher effects on more proximal parental outcomes such as parental stress, parental competencies, and parent–child interaction/relation. However, more distal outcomes such as marital satisfaction or parent psychopathology revealed lower effect sizes. In addition, the link between changes in parental/family outcomes and changes in ASB was significant across several outcome types, thus confirming the general causal assumption of PTP. Postintervention effects were stable across several moderators, although clinical applications revealed slightly higher effect sizes than preventive applications. Several findings cast some doubt on these generally positive results: For example, effect sizes decreased considerably in not only short- (3 to 12 months) but also especially long-term follow ups (12 months or more), and the vast majority of outcome assessments stemmed from parent ratings. Finally, we found a clear negative connection between sample and effect size. Whether this is due to publication bias or indicates a better implementation quality in smaller studies remains an open question.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beelmann et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2044a5c747dde04df7b6d8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2022.101798
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Handbook of Disruptive Behavior Disorders2000 · 148 citations
  2. 2Parent Effectiveness Training.1969 · 322 citations
  3. 3Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis1985 · 2,541 citations
  4. 4Handbook of parent training: Parents as co-therapists for children's behavior problems.1989 · 285 citations
  5. 5Buffering negative effects of immigration on cognitive, social, and educational development: A multinational meta‐analysis of child and adolescent prevention programmes2020 · 20 citations