PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2003Journal of Latin American Studies99 citations

The Contrasting Variants of the Populism of Hugo Chávez and Alberto Fujimori

View Full Paper
SESteve Ellner

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

During the 1990s Peru's Alberto Fujimori and Argentina's Carlos Menem were the two main political successes of Latin American populism. Both completed two successive presidential terms, a unique accomplishment in the continent, and overcame the political instability that previously beset their nations. Scholars who analysed these and other contemporary regimes concluded that Latin American populism was flexible and resilient enough to adapt to a radically different environment from that of the 1930s and 1940s, when it had emerged as a major force. Some political scientists labelled as ‘neopopulism’ the newer variant of populism in the context of globalisation and widespread acceptance of neoliberal policies. These scholars stressed two salient features of neopopulism that contrasted with ‘classical populism’ of the 1930s and 1940s: its social base consisting of members of the informal economy, as opposed to the organised working class; and its implementation of neoliberal policies, as against the model of import substitution and state interventionism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Steve Ellner (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20467b519d41c0cedf6522https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x02006685
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper