PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1996Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin75 citations

Problem Domain and Prospect Frame: Choice under Opportunity versus Threat

View Full Paper
SHScott HighhousePPPaul W. Paese

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This investigation considered the impact of alternative problem domains on choice by crossing prospect frame (loss vs. gain) witth problem domain (threat vs. opportunity) in afactorial design. In responding to traditional framing problems, proble-msposing explicit threats), subjects faced with gain prospects have generally been thought to presuppose losses or shift their reference point downward. Abelson and Levi have suggested that, similarly, subjects might be expected to presuppose gains or shift their reference point upward when faced with problems that pose explicit opportunities. Choices in this study were consistent with this prediction. However, measures aimed at assessing the interpretations of framing problems did not support the presumed shifts in reference point. Moreover, evidence was found for a problem domain effect on overall risk seeking in one problem arena (obs), but no such effect was found in another problem arena (money).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Highhouse et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a204b3c6504ae8788d1e32ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296222002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper