PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2013Scientific Reports224 citationsOpen Access

A comparative assessment and analysis of 20 representative sequence alignment methods for protein structure prediction

RYRenxiang YanDXDong XuJYJianyi Yang

Key Points

  • This assessment aims to compare 20 sequence alignment algorithms for their effectiveness in predicting protein structures.
  • Collected 20 alignment algorithms including 10 published and 10 new ones.
  • Benchmarking conducted on 538 non-redundant proteins for fold-recognition using a uniform template library.
  • Evaluation of profile-profile, sequence-profile, and sequence-sequence alignment approaches.
  • Profile-profile methods yield an average TM-score 26.5% higher than sequence-profile methods and 49.8% higher than sequence-sequence methods.
  • Incorporating predicted or native structure features can improve accuracy of profile-profile alignments by 9.6% or 21.4%.
  • Even with improvements, TM-scores from profile-profile methods with experimental features remain 37.1% lower than TM-align.

Abstract

Protein sequence alignment is essential for template-based protein structure prediction and function annotation. We collect 20 sequence alignment algorithms, 10 published and 10 newly developed, which cover all representative sequence- and profile-based alignment approaches. These algorithms are benchmarked on 538 non-redundant proteins for protein fold-recognition on a uniform template library. Results demonstrate dominant advantage of profile-profile based methods, which generate models with average TM-score 26.5% higher than sequence-profile methods and 49.8% higher than sequence-sequence alignment methods. There is no obvious difference in results between methods with profiles generated from PSI-BLAST PSSM matrix and hidden Markov models. Accuracy of profile-profile alignments can be further improved by 9.6% or 21.4% when predicted or native structure features are incorporated. Nevertheless, TM-scores from profile-profile methods including experimental structural features are still 37.1% lower than that from TM-align, demonstrating that the fold-recognition problem cannot be solved solely by improving accuracy of structure feature predictions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yan et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2054ff1ce0fe566a5acd7chttps://doi.org/10.1038/srep02619
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper