PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2006Medical Care Research and Review59 citations

Cost-Effectiveness of Hospital Pay-for-Performance Incentives

View Full Paper
TNTammie A. NahraKRKristin L. ReiterRHRichard A. Hirth

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

One increasingly popular mechanism for stimulating quality improvements is pay-for-performance, or incentive, programs. This article examines the cost-effectiveness of a hospital incentive system for heart-related care, using a principal-agent model, where the insurer is the principal and hospitals are the agents. Four-year incentive system costsfor the payer were dollar 22,059,383, composed primarily of payments to the participating hospitals, with approximately 5 percent in administrative costs. Effectiveness is measured in stages, beginning with improvements in the processes of heart care. Care process improvements are converted into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, with reference to literatures on clinical effectiveness and survival. An estimated 24,418 patients received improved care, resulting in a range of QALYs from 733 to 1,701, depending on assumptions about clinical effectiveness. Cost per QALY was found to be between dollar 12,967 and dollar 30,081, a level well under consensus measures of the value of a QALY.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nahra et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2058d4ece94d65a85ad483https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558705283629
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper